Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for May, 2007

31
May

*Sigh*

In the midst of yesterday’s Being Frank shenanigans, I decided I would write a post entitled “The damage done by Catholics who stick their heads in the sand and refuse to accept our Church has ever done anything wrong”. However, that issue took on a life of its own with the events of yesterday following the death of a woman in Auckland after her power was cut by Mercury Energy.

How important is it that we admit our failings? Does it show weakness? Is it an opportunity to learn from, or a hindrance to be avoided?

Is it humility or stupidity – and what good comes from it in the end?

30
May

Say what?

Regarding this story

It’s all very well to speak of “a Christian nation” – but I don’t think they’ve considered their argument very well – as evidenced by the ironic haka included in the protest.

29
May

If I hear another idiot say…

Ever have one of those moments where you find yourself screaming at talkback radio as yet another caller rings in to make some inane comment about a topical issue?

I had one of those moments just last week when the whole boy racer issue was being discussed in the media and on talkback radio.

To be honest I’m getting sick to death of people who seem to want to downplay or write off the serious problems with today’s youth culture by making the stupid comment that go something like “but young people have always done things like this”.

What a load of garbage.

Yes, young people always are and always will be risk-takers, and rule breakers, etc, but the fact is that they type of risks that young people are taking today, and the rules that they are breaking are completely different to rule breaking and risk taking that occurred in previous generations of young people.

These young people are just breaking rules, or snubbing social conventions, they are actively breaking the law, and they aren’t just taking risks, they are engaging in extremely dangerous activities and behaviours.

Not only that, but we aren’t talking about a small minority of young people. Dangerous and risky law breaking activities are becoming normal behaviour for the majority and in fact they appear to be becoming the norm now for many young people too.

But then what do you expect?

Throw in a bit of Jack-Ass, a spot of Fast and the Furious, add a large dollop of finance companies willing to irresponsibly finance young inexperienced people into high performance super-cars. Take these ingredients and add in a dose of bad parenting philosophies and a large dose of rights without responsibilities type thinking and you’ve got a real recipe for disaster.

But it gets even better.

Add to that mix an absentee father, some messed up pop-culture role models and celebrities, and on top of that throw in a large dose of self-centred me first type thinking and you’ve got an even bigger problem.

To finish off this little cake, make sure you mix it in a bowl of moral relativism and rationalistic atheism which proclaims that there is no life beyond this one and that humanity is just a bare knuckled fight for survival of the fittest – now you’ve got yourself a real mess.

Young people today aren’t just acting out “like they’ve always done” in previous generations.

They are taking whole new risks, and facing serious social issues that most of our parents or grandparents never even knew existed.
Today’s young people have grown up in a culture that places more value on a rare North Island snail than on the life of an unborn human baby.

They have grown up in a culture that tells them that sex isn’t sacred, in fact it’s just a sport and that as long as you wear a condom there are no consequences for sex with whomever, whenever and however you like.

They have grown up in culture of instant communications, instant fixes and “have what you want, when you want it” type philosophies.

Young people today have been offered Britney Spears, P-Diddy and Paris Hilton as culture icons and role models, and they have been raised on a steady diet of MTV, Shortland Street and Big Brother.

They have been told time and time again that there is no God, there is no truth, that morality is relative, pornography is a great career path, and that pre-nuptial agreements are part of a normal marriage arrangement.

One look at our youth suicide, youth mental health and youth sexual disease figures and it becomes plainly apparent that young people today are vastly different and not just living like young people from previous generations did.

Until we face the fact that the philosophies we have embraced have led us to this point, and that we need new philosophies which lead us in another direction, then boy racers will be just the tip of a very large and very unhealthy ice-berg.

Anyone care to shuffle some deck chairs?

28
May

I see your true colours

Notice anything different about the site today?

Provided everything works as I’m told it will, you should be looking at a green banner instead of the gold one of last week. That’s because we are out of the season of Easter, and in to the season of Ordinary Time. What’s more, if you looked at yesterday when you checked out the site yesterday, you would have noticed a fantastic blood red banner to celebrate the feast of Pentecost.

(For the very small minority of you who don’t come back to this site every day for your fix of great blogging, here’s a secret link that will show you what Being Frank looked like dressed in red.)

After Mass on Saturday evening, I remarked to our local parish priest how fantastic the church building looked decked out in her red for Pentecost: the banners, the flowers, his vestments – all looked awesome. And I choose that word deliberately.

See, I’m a bit guilty of treating Mass like a habit sometimes. I go every week, and so it can become quite routine if I don’t pay attention. The awe of what I’m experiencing is diminished by the fact that I experienced much the same the week before.

So, I quite like it when there is a seasonal change in the Church’s calendar because when my parish changes the outer appearance of the church building, I can’t help but notice the change and so my focus is drawn away from whatever it was on before and back to the House of God.

I love it!

I love the fact that we have a faith so rich in symbolism and majesty, in tradition and Tradition. It’s refreshing and comforting at the same time. When I think about all of the symbols I see in just my local parish, each and every one of them is there for a specific reason – to draw me and my attention closer to God.

And yesterday, at least, the red worked. :)

27
May

Struggling on this…

I don’t mean to cause any offence by this post, but it’s something i struggle with. One of my (non-Christian) friends and I have been talking about church and God quite a bit lately, and she asked me “So do Christians hate all gay people”. I think this is a huge misconception, and my answer was “of course not!”. I also noticed a big billboard in town put up by someone who apparently also thinks this is a common misconception. It reads “contrary to popular belief I don’t hate gay people – God”.

- who runs that cool God billboard campaign by the way? It is a cool idea! –

Anyway, get past your image of flamboyant Hero parade participants marching down Queen St wearing overtly sexual clothes (totally disagree with that for gay, straight or any people – and no gay people I know are like that anyway), and you realise that many gay people are often struggling with their feelings and it really upsets them. One of my close friends is very shy and he struggled to tell me he was gay a little while ago. Apparently he has been struggling with it for years. I love him to bits and the fact he is gay doesn’t change that. I don’t think I can actually agree with him being gay, but if he was born like that, it is really very sad.

But talking to my friend got me thinking, why do people have to be born that way, if it is the way they’re born? It’s so sad for them. To express their sexuality is a sin, and it seems totally unnatural and doesn’t produce children – is it like a sad thing to be born with, in the same way people can be born with any sort of thing wrong with them?

It is also something many Christian denominations are struggling with, and it is causing huge divisions in many. The Catholic Church agrees people can be born gay, but teaches it is a sin to act on those feelings. So I guess that means abstinence.

26
May

Let’s Talk About Sex

There was an article in the NZ herald last week concerning a recent study on the sex lives of 16 to 25 years old by Durex and Family Planning. One interesting point it made was that twice as many women that men claimed they had 10 or more sexual partners (thirteen percent in comparison to seven percent respectively). Family Planning head Jackie Edmond stated that, while surprised at the statistics, it was anecdotal evidence that today’s young women were more assertive about their sexuality. The study also noted some interesting points about when young people commence sexual activity. For both guys and girls, 16 to 19 was the most common age-range for losing their virginity. However, nearly one in five people, or 17 per cent, started at 15 or younger.

I’m definitely no advocate of the Family Planning Association, but Edmond’s point about this newfound sexual assertiveness among women in that age group is an interesting phenomena. I believe these statistics are symptomatic of the fact that women no longer have an understanding of the importance or consequences of their actions in relationships.

In my opinion, one can’t really blame young women considering the sex education programmes in secondary schools. The reality is that women play a fundamental role in setting the physical boundaries in any relationship. In no way am I excusing males from playing their part in living chastity, however, due to our different make-ups, women are predominantly stronger in areas such as purity and living chastity before marriage. However, our schools no longer instruct young girls about the fundamental role they play in living abstinence, imposing physical boundaries, the different psyches of the two sexes or the consequences (outside of health risks) of sex outside of marriage. Instead the consequences of sexual activity are reduced to sexually transmitted diseases, unwanted pregnancies, and dealing with abortion. As many of these programmes suggest that there are medical quick fixes, for many young girls the risks of having sex are outweighed by the supposed benefits.

I suppose it would help if we Catholics practiced what we preach with reference to our own education programmes on relationships in our schools. Coincidentally, last week I had a conversation with a year 12 girl attending a Catholic girl school in Auckland about the programme her school had implemented. I inquired into the content and she replied that the teacher (who I know personally, and is a practicing Catholic) gave the class options. Basically, the teacher had said that it was far better to live abstinence, and then proceeded to do a pretty good job of describing the health consequences/risks of having sex outside of marriage. She also went into quite a bit of detail describing contraceptive devices. Quite frankly, I believe young women need reasons beyond the health risks involved in having sex outside of marriage.

Perhaps a great place to start would be a course on dating/relationships. Good questions for discussion could be: What’s appropriate physical behaviour before marriage? What are the emotional and spiritual consequences of sex outside of marriage? What are the advantages of waiting (besides avoiding the health risks)? Of course these questions would need to be firmly rooted in an understanding of the different make-ups of both men and women and the emotional damage of inappropriate physical affection before marriage. I don’t want to pull out the objectification of women card again, but really if young girls were aware of the fact that they were turning themselves into objects as opposed to being loved, I’m sure it would help them to live purity better. Hence there’s much to do. Viva la revolution!, one by one.

25
May

Oops! I did it again.

Well another Friday and another decision had to be made on what to write about this week. It seems the blog forum was a busy place for discussion again this week, which once again forced my hand. Yet another heavy hitting topic has to be shelved. But look for a blog entitled “When infallibility is not quite good enough: What the Pope wrote in a private letter addressed personally to the world’.

Stuck for something to write about, I perused the Thursday paper and found this little gem in the editorials. Apparently, a study was done at some stage into whether there was a “disturbing correlation between social dysfunction and christianisation” The researcher chose the rates of homicide and divorce, amongst other things, in the USA to investigate the effect of religion on society’s ills in a developed country.

The writer then goes on to say that “the study may not have proved that Christianity was the cause of widespread dysfunction but there is one factor that suggest there is a reason for it – the notion that wrongdoers can be forgiven by confessing their sins. That leaves them free to repeat the offense…”

Now I haven’t done much research into this, but surely to even suggest that Christianity is the cause of much of society’s woes is a bit rich. And then to link it to confession? I don’t know about other people, but I tend to go to confession with the intent not to commit whatever sin it was that I committed again. Going to confession just to wipe the slate clean, so you feel good about doing it again doesn’t sound like the approach most people would take…

To me, it sounds like a lack of understanding of what Christianity is, and what it means to be Christian.