Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for June, 2007

30
Jun

It’s gonna to be a very “Pauline Year”….

It official, the Pope has declared June 2008 – June 2009 the Year of St Paul in honour of 2000th anniversary of his birth. One thing I found quite interesting (but of course commonsensical) is that he has asked that the year have a special emphasis on ecumenism.

Pope Benedict XVI affirmed:

“The Apostle of the Gentiles, who dedicated himself to the spreading of the good news to all peoples, spent himself for the unity and harmony of all Christians,”.

“May he guide us and protect us in this bimillenary celebration,” he added, “helping us to advance in the humble and sincere search for the full unity of all the members of the mystical body of Christ.”

Now I know it’s a while off but I’m overly excited (for numerous reasons) one of which being that I would like to learn EXACTLY what it means to be ecumenical. Now with the modest formation that I have been given, I’m pretty sure it doesn’t mean compromising on any of the central tenets of the faith in order to bring our separated brethren into the Church. (if that was the case, I’m sure ecumenism would have been done and dusted a long time ago). So what exactly does it mean for the Church to be ecumenical? How can we, as individual members of the Church, respond to the call of the Pope to be ecumenical?

I know it’s a long way off but I’m seriously quite excited and there’s no harm in being prepared a little early right?

By the way it’s also official that Bro is the new Mate…

Maybe I need to lay off the espresso for a while…

29
Jun

Somewhere Beyond the Sea

Well another Friday and yet another week drawing to a close. For those who are in Auckland, you may have missed the fact that the World Youth Day Cross and Icon have been making their way around our fair city the last couple of days, with stopovers in selected schools and parishes.

Anyone know how it’s been going?

From 6.30pm tonight, the WYD Cross and Icon will be at the Logan Campbell Theatre (sorry those not in Auckland!) where there will be a farewell Mass and celebration. I believe this will also include a concert at the end. This will be a great opportunity for Catholics young and old to show some support for the WYD by turning out in big numbers at the Mass. Hey, we might even make the news!

So if you aren’t already planning on coming to the farewell Mass, then plan on it! This is perhaps your best chance to catch a glimpse of the Cross and Icon as the WYD will probably not be held down these parts again for awhile! Oh and try and make it across the sea as well for the WYD itself, it’s a fantastic opportunity to mix and mingle with hundreds and thousands of other Catholics on ‘pilgrimage’!

28
Jun

Hearing what we want to hear…

Ox’s post on Tuesday is coincidentally on the same topic as I’m writing about today…

A few weeks ago, I caught a portion of a BBC interview with Bishop Kevin Dowling, of Rustenburg, South Africa. Given my interest, and work, in the area of HIV and AIDS, I’m a little embarrassed to admit I hadn’t heard of him before.

A quick Google search (the height of respectable research…) turns up plenty of information about him, and indeed a 2005 Time magazine article calls him “the first African bishop to call on the church to consider lifting its absolute ban on condom use”.

In the part of the interview I saw he was saying what I discovered and felt when I worked in Africa last year; that in the face of reality, and the death toll and pandemic of HIV and AIDS, the Church’s teaching on condoms is both ineffective and illogical. But as I listened to this softly spoken, but obviously compassionate, man one big question stuck with me.

Why, WHY, would Bishop Dowling and others like him call for a review of this topic? It can’t be because he benefits financially from the distribution of condoms; he clearly has a love of Our Lord and His children, and is truly serving the weakest and poorest; and it would be sanctimonious to say he is ignorant on this subject…

I’m a little loathe to recycle quotes, because of a tendency on this site to discredit the people who made them, but in this case Fr James Keenan, a professor of theological ethics at Boston College, Massachusetts, sums up perfectly how I view this topic: “The issue of the Catholic Church and condoms has to be resolved by listening to men of the church who have the experience, tenacity and wisdom of Bishop Dowling.”

Please, please let’s not revisit tired old arguments that seek to discredit the effectiveness of condoms as a tool in reducing the spread of HIV. My question, and the focus of this post, is have you stopped to ask yourself why people like Bishop Dowling, who are really working on this issue at the coalface (unlike far too many in the Vatican…), have this opinion? Why are we not listening to them?

27
Jun

No margin of error

Nice to hear that our politicians have officially decreed themselves inhuman. If the idea was to avoid ridicule and satire, you’d think that not annoying the media would have been a higher priority.

The contention that parliamentary reporting is for “parlimentary purposes”, as Peter Dunne contends, is a little unnerving. That’s tantamount to saying that parliament doesn’t need to be accountable to the people.

When a government gets to the point of the US administration, with the vice president inventing additional branches of government to place himself under, it’s the satirical media (such as the Daily Show) who offer a beacon of hope to those observing from afar.

Here’s hoping these “interim” rules really prove to be such.

25
Jun

Inspiration abound

I like posting on Mondays.  Why?  Because Mondays follow Sundays, and Sunday is when I get a lot of inspiration. 

See, in my life, I have found that God uses two main “vehicles” to deliver me inspiration.  The first is my wife.  She has a way of drawing out the best ideas in me, challenging the not-so-good ones and providing me more support than someone like me deserves.  She rocks.

The other is the Mass.  Bright ideas and flashes of inspiration are surprisingly common for me while in prayer at Mass – even with my son crawling all over me and chewing anything he can get his hands on.  And it doesn’t really matter what church or who the priest is or even what country I’m in: I remember one of my favourite ideas coming to me while in Mass in Australia on my honeymoon!

Why is this?  Well, have you ever actually sat back and thought about the way the Church has structured that one little hour we give God every week?  In my opinion, the whole experience is just geared up to provoke thought and point your mind towards Heaven.  Take the church building itself.  Historically, they were the tallest buildings in the land.  You could spot a church (especially a cathedral) from miles away – have a look at some early photos/drawings of Auckland City circa 1900 if you don’t believe me.  And, even if you couldn’t spot the cross that adorned the highest spire, you would hear the bells as they rang at all sorts of times of the day to remind you that they were there, as is God, and that you should not forget that. 

Even with the decrease in traditional church architecture nowadays, every modern or ancient Catholic church building always has a number of similar elements, right?  Easy examples you may be thinking of are the altar, the tabernacle and the pews, but there’s also the Stations of the Cross, the baptismal font and the stained glass windows, to name but a few.  While we don’t always notice these items, they are there, and they add a fantastic depth to the tapestry of any church building in my opinion.  Each one can be a source of inspiration in and of themselves.

But say you’re not one for architecture and interior decorating.  Well, look at the Mass.  The Mass is a brilliant example of simplicity and structure at its finest.  There is a mixture of prayer and song, silence and preaching, participation and observing, community and solitude, ceremony and symbolism – it doesn’t get any better than that!  Oh, but yes it does.  The culmination of the Mass is an experience you cannot get anywhere else – a personal encounter with Christ Himself that is literally beyond comparison.

Just brilliant.  Is it any surprise that after attending Catholic services for many years, and spending quite a bit of time with the Pope, Tony Blair is reportedly considering coming into the fullness of the Faith?  Not surprising to me at all. 

And if you are guilty of taking the Mass for granted (as most of us are from time to time), and you’re in Auckland, I reckon you should come along to the Send-Off for the World Youth Day Cross and Icon this Friday 29th.  It’s a free event that starts with Mass with the bishops and many priests, and ends with a bit of a party.  It should be an inspiring event.

Otherwise, if you’re still left looking for inspiration, have a chat with my wife. ;)

24
Jun

Unemployable?

Flicking through the NZ Herald the other day I came upon an article on employment. In it Neer Korn (a market researcher) was of the opinion that Generation Y is a flighty, fickle, selfish bunch that employers should avoid. Gen Y’s apparently think short term and will inevitably use their employers for experience then move on. They are self centred, have large egos, and are eternally optimistic. They’re on the lookout for short cuts to success, and have a culture of immediacy. Apparently employers must learn to recognise and somehow connect with the ridiculous level of unrealistic optimism and self-esteem that comes with a Gen Y staff member, if they bother employing them at all.

It all sounds so sad! Like poor Gen Y’s spirit, high expectations and optimism must be crushed out of it to make Gen Y’s into effective workers. I thought optimism and self-esteem were good things! Or is it just that Gen Y’s are simply lazy and incapable of settling down? I guess the reality of the workplace isn’t all fun and games after all. But it is understandable Gen Y’s feel this way considering the hype around education these days. They’ve been encouraged and told they can achieve, be and do anything they want to all their lives. Their baby boomer parents had a more limited choice of what they could be. They didn’t get to choose from a world of choices, degrees, diplomas and certificates, often leading to a decision making crisis!

Yet despite the degrees or diplomas, obviously Gen Y’s don’t lend themselves well to actually “doing the job”. In fact, after all the hype of “being anything you want” working life can be quite disappointing really. You mean I actually have to sit at a desk and do work?

So if all this is true where did Gen Y’s work ethic go? Has it had everything too easy? Yet Gen Y’s attitude does seem to have forced employees to think more about how to make workplaces fit people. Workplaces increasingly think creatively about how they reward employees and make work a better place to be -which can only be a good thing considering work is where we all spend a lot of our lives.

How did we get to this point where we all rush round busy all the time in crazy jobs anyway! Is it even natural to spend your days in front of a computer driving our capital market like so many people do? Maybe we’d be happier if we all went back to farming…

23
Jun

Legitimizing the illegitimate

I was browsing through some of the material that Victoria University provides its tutors to prepare them for teaching classes at the University (for my own work purposes). On my travels I happened to stumble across a section entitled “diversity”. Here’s the link for anyone interested: http://www.utdc.vuw.ac.nz/tutors/Small_Group.pdf

One section was entitled sexuality and this was an interesting read indeed. The guide asserts that teachers should not discriminate on the grounds of sexual orientation. Fair point I thought, and easily reconciled with my own beliefs: all students are persons made in the image and likeness of God. From a Catholic’s perspective this makes sense: Hate the sin and love the sinner etc etc. I personally have many practicing gay and lesbian friends, I treat them with respect but they know my point of view of the subject of homosexuality. I wouldn’t (and neither would they) class me as homophobic.

However, some of the documents suggestions for implementation in the classroom were a little absurd and I think largely reflective of the philosophical mess caused by postmodern thought. “There is no truth” its advocates would purport, yet the irony is, that if I was teaching at that particular university and publicly objected to the guidelines, I would most certainly be called homophobic. I have quoted in full some of the publication below and I would be interested to hear other’s opinions on the ideas it presents:

The section quotes Long et al. (I presume they’re scholars of identity politics or the likes) stating:
“Teachers who are conscientious about avoiding racial and sexual stereotyping may give offence by selecting examples that assume that all students are involved in heterosexual dating: this renders gay, lesbian and bisexual students invisible and their lives illegitimate”.

It continues with a few suggestion of how to ‘promote a safe and welcoming environment for gay and lesbian students’. I was quite fascinated by this recommendation:

“Language often acts as a barrier. Terms such as fag, dyke, etc should be discouraged, but this is dependant on context. If a person has identified themselves as “queer” or as a “dyke” he or she should not be prevented from using whatever label they think is appropriate. Some words have, in fact, become an empowerment tool and using such words sends a message that they are not insulting, and we should try to avoid assumptions.”

Then there were these two suggestions:
“Use gender inclusive language such as partner or spouse.”
“Where applicable use positive examples of different lifestyle choices (eg. inspirations of gay poets in literature). Silence of this kind of material can indicate censoring.”

Hmm…postmodernism has reared its ugly head once again, endeavouring to legitimize the illegitimate under the guise of subjectivity and a distorted sense of plurality.…..I must say I’m disappointed but not surprised.