Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for April, 2008

30
Apr

How Benedict XVI Will Make History

It always fascinates me when people can step back and look at the present with what one might say are ‘timeless eyes’. A good friend of mine stumbled across a great article recently from Newsweek by George Weigel. He’s always a ‘cracking good read’, to abuse a well-loved phrase of this blog. (Check out Letters to a Young Catholic, his whopping two-inch biography on JPII, Courage to Be Catholic and many more…ok, enough with the Weigel plug…)

Anyway…so this article, How Benedict XVI Will Make History, is really worth a read. He discusses the distinct modern form of power of Popes…that of moral persuasion. He challenges the idea that “religious and moral conviction is irrelevant to shaping the flow of contemporary history.” In particular, he explores how the Holy Father sees decades beyond his own Papacy in reshaping the dialogue with Islam.

At the risk of fobbing readers off to something else two weeks in a row (see last week’s post)…this article really is too good to miss. And don’t miss the part where he says JPII had a ‘pyrotechnic personality’…nice one!

29
Apr

You gotta love that political correctness

I stumbled across this news story just recently – isn’t it great to live such a modern society, where we are truly open and free to talk honestly about important moral issues?

New MRSA strain afflicting homosexuals faces political correctness whitewash, group claims

Washington DC, Jan 29, 2008 / 04:40 am (CNA).- Some conservative groups are alleging that news of a microbe resistant to multiple drugs and found disproportionately among homosexual men is being suppressed due to hostile “politically correct” reactions, Cybercast News Service reports.

Researchers recently announced the discovery of a new form of MRSA, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, an infection that is 13 to 14 times more prevalent in homosexual men than the general population.

“These multi-drug resistant infections often affect gay men at body sites in which skin-to-skin contact occurs during sexual activities,” said Binh Diep, the University of California-San Francisco scientist who led the team that isolated the new strain of MRSA. Their study was published two weeks ago in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Matt Barber, director of cultural policy for Concerned Women of America (CWA), said after “pretty solid” initial reporting of the outbreak, news coverage began to change when conservative groups like CWA began noting the microbe was spread primarily through male homosexual activity.

“The real story here is the way that the media have whitewashed this outbreak,” Barber told Cybercast News Service. “It is amazing to see what they’ve done with this.”

The Human Rights Campaign (HRC) and other organizations began to jump up and down a bit and scream, and The New York Times and other organizations started to backpedal,” Barber said. Rather than reporting the behaviors associated with the outbreak and its danger to others, Barber said, “The story now became about how groups like mine were supposedly misrepresenting the outbreak as some sort of ‘new gay plague’ or ‘the new AIDS’ – things we never said.”

The homosexual activist group Human Rights Campaign accused CWA and others of being “anti-gay bigots” for recommending homosexual men curtail their sexual activities.

“Serious medical issues deserve serious consideration, not wildly off-the-mark press releases from anti-gay groups trying to capture media attention,” HRC President Joe Solmonese said in a news release. Solmonese called the conservative organizations’ responses a kind of “hysteria,” which he thought resembled some reactions to the outbreak of HIV/AIDS in the early 1980s.

The reaction of activist groups prompted an apology from the University of California at San Francisco, distancing itself from mentioning homosexual men.

“We regret that our recent news report (1-14-08) about an important population-based study on MRSA USA300 with public health implications contained some information that could be interpreted as misleading,” the university’s Web site said, according to Cybercast News Service.

“We deplore negative targeting of specific populations in association with MRSA infections or other public health concerns, and we will be working to ensure that accurate information about the research is disseminated to the health community and the general public,” it added.

The Center for Disease Control and Prevention also emphasized that the new MRSA strain is “not a sexually transmitted disease in the classic sense,” saying the bacteria’s spread could be stopped by washing hands and covering open wounds.

An internationally known infectious disease specialist, Dr. John Diggs, told Cybercast News Service that the outbreak was “especially troubling” because the microbe can spread to the wider community.

Though MRSA has typically been confined to hospitals, he said, “You can take something that was relatively isolated in a small place, and suddenly, when it spreads to the general population, things such as school wrestling matches, or football games or basketball games or other sporting events, can take on a specter – they can become deadly.”

Dr. Diggs said the university study itself said the MRSA infection manifests itself as “an abscess in the buttocks, genitals or perineum,” concluding the microbe “probably started out in San Francisco, and has been disseminated by the frequent cross-coastal travel” of homosexual men between San Francisco and Boston.

“Men who practice anal sex, men who have promiscuous sex, men who have multiple partners in short periods of time are much more likely to spread this disease,” he said to Cybercast News Service. “It’s not because of who they are. It’s because of what they do.”

“When you face that reality, then you have to start taking a serious look and deciding that the best public health intervention is to discourage behavior that causes the infection to spread,” Dr. Diggs said.

28
Apr

What’s the answer?

Zimbabwe is seriously getting me down.

In reading some of the latest news on Zimbabwe, I can’t help but get depressed. Mugabe sounds like an absolute nutter who is hell-bent (literally) on driving what remains of that country into the ground. I’m basing this opinion not only on the various media reports of his latest attempts to continue to hold on to “power”, but on first-hand testimonies. As
I have blogged before, a number of my friends and workmates are from South Africa, and at least one is directly from Zimbabwe. He talks of some pretty horrid treatment he and his family suffered while living there – and that was over two years ago! Look at how much worse it has got now.

So I’m left wondering what the answer is? Honestly, I don’t know. What can we do about a pycho-dictator who continues to kill his country – in every measure of the word – while the world looks on and does little more than shake its head? How do you reach someone like this? When even the people themselves are rising up and still not being heard or are simply being crushed, what can you do?

It seems a miracle is what they need – but yet none has yet materialised. Sometimes I wonder if God looks down on parts of our planet and wishes that He never made that promise to Noah never to flood the world again. Seriously, some of these places seem to be as far from God as one can get. The Captain’s post on Thursday talked of more examples of mankind’s unbelievable ability to destroy himself, and I’m sure you can think of plenty more.

What can we do? Seriously – what can we do? Wrap ourselves up in a nice little isolationist blanket and saying “well, at least things aren’t so bad down here in NZ”? Hmmmm…probably not going to help much. But do some of you out there have some ideas?

Because I feel like I’m fresh out.

27
Apr

How do we think?

I’m reading an interesting book at the moment called “Status Anxiety” by Alain de Botton. It’s probably not a book I would have picked up if it hadn’t been recommended to me by a friend because the cover pictures cliché suburbian houses with a “Desperate Housewives” type woman with a gardening spade poised behind her back. It looks like it’s going to be one of those “modern” Marian Keyes type books (no offence to people who like reading those).

I haven’t finished the book yet, but so far it weaves together history, psychology, and economics in an effort to explain where our mentality and ideas about what is “success” and “happiness” in life come from. It talks about the causes of our anxieties and then gives solutions as to how we might overcome our programmed mindsets.

As did Jesus, the book puts love at the centre of all things. There are two types of love we seek in our lives apparently – love from the world (being the status that comes from gaining whatever the world defines as “success”) and romantic love. This could be said to frame the reasons for all our actions.

Only a few hundred years ago, in the age of Kings and Queens you were locked in your class. But if you couldn’t move, at least you couldn’t be dissatisfied that through some fault of your own you had not succeeded in life. If you have accepted life to be hard, there is a certain kind of contentment in that?

Now the world is said to be our personal oyster as we carry on from when the idea of the American dream was first formulated. But that means if you don’t succeed perhaps you can now blame yourself only?

What causes dissatification?   How do we know when we have succeeded?   It is notable that we are not so content if we see others have more than us – just as the Russians only became dissatisfied when American vice-president Nixon showed them how Americans lived in comparison to them in the late 1950′s, hence their president Khrushchev becoming angry that America’s technological and material achievements were being shown to the Russians at all. Human psychology seems to mean that we decide when we are happy by reference to what we see others have. If we sat in a circle and every man had two pieces of bread and we had three we would think ourselves lucky and happy. If we had three, and every other person had ten, we would think ourselves unlucky and perhaps be unhappy. A very fickle way to live life?

It is interesting to understand the way society thinks, so we might challenge ourselves as to whether our thought patterns are in accordance with what we should be seeking and the goals we should have as Christians.

26
Apr

The Early Church

I’ve been out of action for the last week on a course. On this course on of the subjects we studied was Church history. We managed to get through 2000 years in 16 lectures! Let’s just say that it was more of an overview of Church history that an in depth looks at the Church over the last 2000 years. For this reason, the priest who gave the lectures, very aware of the time constraints, left a pile of books with us for reading in our spare time. One of these books was by Rodney Stark, The rise of Christianity: a sociologist reconsiders history. What’s interesting about this sociologist is that he depicts the rise of Christianity in quite a positive light (this is rather rare in academia) and he’s not Christian himself. It’s a very useful book to read if you an interested in an outsider’s perspective on how Christianity effected the ancient world. One of the chapters gives an in depth account of the effects of Christianity on women in the ancient world. Now, for obvious reasons, I gravitated towards this chapter and thought it would be interesting blog material. I went to the University library this morning to see if I could find the book, but it’s on loan, so I apologies for no stats or historical sources. I will just outline some interesting points he makes, memory permitting.
Starks main thesis (in this chapter on women) is that they were crucial (perhaps more so that men) in spreading the doctrines of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire. Some of the points he makes are:
-Women were more likely than men to convert to Christianity because it protected them from spousal abandonment and divorce.
-As Christian communities rejected infanticide, abortion and even contraception (fancy that!), which were common practice in the Roman Empire, the Christian community increased more rapidly over time – Christian women were having more babies! Moreover, even at this early stage of history, the Church stipulated that those who married a non-Christian were morally obliged to pass on the faith to their children.
-Stark reports that it was commonplace that if a roman woman gave birth to a girl, she was strongly encouraged to practice infanticide. Thus, there were a shortage of woman in Rome and therefore roman (non-Christian men) would marry Christian women out of a lack of supply of women. Often these men would convert to Christianity after marriage.
There are few other reasons Stark gives for the influential role of women in the early church, thoroughly recommend the book for those interested. Personally, I found it quite refreshing to read a human scientist with no axe to grind with the Church.

25
Apr

“Once something has been approved by the Government, it’s no longer immoral.”

Today is Anzac Day and we remember all those who bravely served their country in the World War 1. Although I usually associate Anzac Day with the WW1 thanks to the events at Gallipoli, I think I’m correct in saying Anzac Day now commemorates all those who have served their country in all the various armed conflicts we have found ourselves in.

Now I’m not what you would call a devotee to the History Channel but I do enjoy my documentaries and on the History Channel they often show something on WW1 or WW2. One thing that always strikes me is how savage the conflict was, and the sheer courage of the young men who were involved in the battles. How they were able to even function in the conditions they found themselves in with carnage going on all around them, all for the service of their country and the greater good is something I hope I never have to personally have to find out.

Maybe WW1 and WW2 were more clear cut and the lines between which side was ‘good’ and ‘bad’ was more well defined. And I guess the reasons the countries were at war were easier to fathom as well. Perhaps it’s a sign of the times or people are just less trusting of the powers in charge, but who knows why we really go to war these days.

Anyway, today we should offer up our prayers for those who gave their lives for their country, and continually pray for peace in our world.

24
Apr

Happy news from around the world

It’s been a rough one this week and I thought twice before posting about it because I have little faith people are that interested, but I’ve decided that’s not a reason not to do it. So there.

I’ve been musing for months about the fact we’ve been using the same figures – 200,000 dead and two million displaced – for the tragedy in Darfur for the past three years. I find it hard to believe, given the weekly updates I get about the violence, displacements, rapes and deaths, that those are still accurate.

Sure enough, the UN’s decided they’re probably not. We’re up to 300,000. Not an insignficant number, wouldn’t you say?

And then there’s the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo. A country that war ripped apart from 1998-2003, largely ignored by “the international community”. A country that continues to face random, widespread violence, particularly sexual-based, also largely ignored by “the international community”.

And there’s the great news that our dear friend Robert Mugabe looks like he’ll manage, through corruption, coercion, hatred and violence, to maintain his hold on the country he’s driven to the depths.

I thought the Pope did a fabulous job in the US this week, and I wouldn’t have thought he’d touch on these issues. But wouldn’t it be nice if the first thing people in general (always a dangerous category) thought of when they thought of our Church was “champions for the poor and oppressed”? How awesome would that be?

Catholics do some amazing social justice work behind the scenes and I stand in awe of the passion, determination and dedication to God’s unloved and forgotten that they are living every day. How cool would it be if they were the face of the Catholic Church? How proud would He be of us?