Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for May, 2008

31
May

The [B]eloved, the [L]over and [L]ove.

I have just started a new spiritual reading and although I have only had the chance to read several pages, I was profoundly moved by its content. It may sound a bit quirky but the title is Three to get married by Fulton Sheen. Now I believe that I didn’t choose this book, it in fact chose me. Not for any pithy romantic reason, well at least at a human level. In hindsight, I can see how its content meets a personal need to grow in this particular area of my spiritual life. To cut a long story short, I was in dire need of something to lean on (for writing purposes) and this book happened to be first thing I grabbed from my friend’s bookshelf. As I looked at the title of the book I chose at random of the shelf, I must admit I had a little chuckle to myself at the title. After having served it purpose, I decided momentarily to have a quick look at the content of the book, with the hope that it would possibly provide some material for a joke or two. At a quick glance, I realised that this was not one of those cheesy self-help guides for those preparing for marriage, but a theological, philosophical and moral explanation of love and that it offered an extended commentary on how human love is mirrored on Trinitarian love. I just want to post one paragraph for everyone this week from this book. I hope you enjoy it as much as I did!

“Every person is what he loves. Love becomes like unto that which it loves. If it loves heaven, it becomes heavenly, if it loves the carnal as a god, it becomes corruptible. The kind of immortality we have depends on the kinds of loves we have. Putting it negatively, he who tells you what he does not love, also tells you what he is. “Amor pondus meum: Love is my gravitation” said St Augustine. This slow conversion of a subject into an object, of a lover into the beloved, of the miser into his gold, of the saint into his God, discloses the importance of loving the right things. The nobler our loves, the nobler our character. To love what is below the human is degradation; to love what is human for the sake of the human is mediocrity; to love the human for the sake of the Divine is enriching; to love the Divine for its own sake is sanctity”

What I really like about this excerpt is that it spurs one to examination and conversion, It reminds us where our hearts and minds should be.

30
May

“Haven’t you learned anything from that guy who gives those sermons at church? Captain Whatshisname?”

Well I’ve been down in the deep south this week, Invercargill to be precise. It’s a nice little place and I’ve found it quite charming, especially the almost soothing way the locals roll their R’s. It’s a town with character, but would I want to live here? Probably not. As much as I appreciate the quiet charm of the place, I could see myself becoming a little bored of the place, with its one main street rambling through the town, its quaint architecture, and its relaxed attitude towards most things. Oh I can hear all you non-Aucklanders now, up in arms about how snooty and stuck up we big city folk are. Hey it’s not all lattes and lovin’ in Auckland I can tell you now. We have to put up with such inconveniences like rush hour traffic, over priced restaurants, and over crowded carparks.

But I feel I’m doing Southland a disservice here. The people are more friendly, the weather a lot crisper and cleaner, and the scenery is breathtaking (I haven’t seen for myself, but have been reliably informed it is so). I did have to laugh at the sign pointing the way to the beach. A beach in Southland? It must be like a Catholic’s bible. Looks good but rarely used. Oh I’m sure plenty of Catholics use their bibles, they do make sturdy bookends. I actually do find it sad that Catholics don’t indulge in the bible like our Protestant friends.

Anyway, I just want to echo things that have been mentioned by a couple of people here in the last couple of days. NZ is a great place to live. Sure sometimes it looks like we’re in a 3rd world country, I mean what other supposedly 1st world country has problems with power shortages, hospital bed shortages, and people being assaulted with hedgehogs? (Don’t answer as there are probably a good number of examples out there). Ok so the Church isn’t in the best position it could be but if it was perfect, we’d just get lazy and complacent, much like how the dinosaurs got complacent, and look what happened to them. The state of the Church in New Zealand gives us an opportunity to make a stand and push for solid doctrine to be preached to the masses. And at least we have open forums to voice our discontent.

Which brings me to my other point. I’m constantly impressed by the discussions that occur on here. We have contributors who have a lot of good points to make, and usually make them in a gracious manner. Although I do find that on occasions, the discussions do turn a bit nasty and the thinly veiled sarcasm becomes a little more blatant. Hey who knows maybe sarcasm is the best way of getting points across. Seems to work well in Parliament.

It’s easy to get frustrated when your point seems to be ignored, but let’s try and keep things charitable here. Oh some of you may think that a bit of ‘tough love’ on the forum is good to bring people into line. And maybe that’s what Queen Mary thought too when she took over Protestant England. Well maybe that’s going a little far.

29
May

Home

There really is no place like it. Been back on the ground for just under a few hours now, and just reading over some of the posts from the past few weeks.

We’re really down on the Church in New Zealand here on this site, aren’t we?

I’m definitely in a bit of a fog at the moment, fuelled mainly by jet lag and sheer relief to be home, but even taking that into account I still think we have it pretty bloody good here. In many, many ways.

Although those of you who think this country, and the Catholic Church in Aotearoa, is under attack by rampant feminist lesbians with man-hating, family-undermining agendas may disagree…

28
May

Tongues and tears

I remember when I was younger and unaware of concepts like ‘charismatic renewal’ or ‘gifts of the Holy Spirit’, I heard this thing called ‘speaking in tongues’.

When you’re 11, and never heard that before, or things like ‘words of knowledge’, it is quite possible that you’d be a bit frightened, or just weirded out.

For a very long time I wondered about these gifts – I certainly didn’t appear to possess any myself. I wondered why things like making lists, running meetings, writing essays and baking Anzac Biscuits couldn’t also be gifts like speaking in tongues. I could do those, but I certainly couldn’t speak in tongues. I thought maybe God had missed me out!

To briefly digress, I’m a little confused how these more physical, outward gifts (tongues, words of knowledge, healing etc) fit with the interior gifts of the Holy Spirit (piety, counsel, fear of the Lord, fortitude etc)…anyone care to enlighten?

To return…on a number of occasions, and to my mortification sometimes quite publicly, I’ve found myself in tears whilst tryin to express my faith, lamenting an injustice or just generally being overwhelmed with emotion at the fact of God’s love for us and how he sent his son to redeem us. On one such occasion, a dear friend informed me that tears are a sign of the Holy Spirit dwelling within you. Now, since we know that as a Church and as individuals, we are temples of the Holy Spirit, that makes a lot of sense – however I’d never thought about it like that!

My friend went as far as to call it a gift of the Holy Spirit that I am liable to shed tears at what might seem such inopportune moments! I was also very pleased to find recently that St Augustine was, himself, a man known for his tears…so maybe there’s something to say for that!

I’d be interested to know what others thing or know about tears? When you muse for a moment, you realise what a powerful, relieving, healing, expressive, beautifully raw thing it is to shed tears, especially for the sake of God’s love for us.

A final, unrelated word…I sing in a great parish choir and last week we sang Aquinas’ Lauda Sion for Corpus Christi. Dude…check that out, google the lyrics. I’d thoroughly recommend you pray, or even sing (praying twice!) your way through the Lauda Sion…in English and in Latin. What a spiritually rich and sumptuous hymn about the presence of Christ in the Eucharist.

27
May

Loss of reverence…for what? – PART TWO

I was really inspired by James’ post yesterday, and I want to pick up the torch and follow on from the theme that James introduced us to in regards to reverence for the Eucharist.

I am sure that you are all aware that WUSS module 3 has been released along with a special PowerPoint presentation that has been shown in many parishes around the country.

Now I think that WUSS is a great initiative from the NZ Bishops, and it offers an awesome opportunity for Catholics to receive formation about the Eucharist and why the Mass is the “source and summit” of our Catholic faith.

WUSS module 3 is called “The Movements of the Mass” and it is meant to focus on the postures, and other physical things that we do every time we celebrate Mass.

Having seen the official PowerPoint for module 3 I have to say that I found it seriously lacking, and not only that but it was quite childish and it certainly doesn’t promote any sense of dignity or reverence about the Mass.

Let me give you some actual examples:

    The slide showing a priest vesting for Mass simply has the words: “Dress up” written above it as an explanation of what the priest is doing.

    Another photo of a priest carrying the Book of the Gospels has the explanation “Carry books” above it.

    Then at the photo of people receiving Communion we have the explanation: “Eat” and “Drink”

The whole PowerPoint presentation just came across as being really childish and overly simple (like we’re all idiots!) and the lack of actual Catholic catachesis is a real let down.

When you go through the PowerPoint, there isn’t actually any explanation of what is really happening, or why we do certain things in Mass, it’s just a whole lot of photos with simplistic verbs written on them.

The terminology used is so simple and childish that it’s almost insulting to the intelligence of the viewer, and secondly there is actually no catachesis about WHY we do the things that we do in Mass, and WHAT liturgical movement is actually happening.

In the end it reads like a toddlers picture book about verbs, rather than an educational text about liturgical postures and movements.

Sadly; when this approach is applied to pictures of people participating in the Mass it totally belittles the liturgy, reducing it to something childish and silly, and it simply doesn’t teach anybody anything.

It’s like two adults watching a plane take-off, and one turns to the other and points at the sky and says “flying”.

Well that’s just great if you don’t know what the verb “flying” actually means, but it doesn’t answer important educational questions like “why is the plane flying?”, “where is the plane flying to?”, and “how does the plane fly?”.

I have to say that reading the PowerPoint makes me feel like Tom Cruise in the movie Rain Man

Interestingly enough, a friend of mine told me about some people who have not been attending Mass, and have only recently started coming to Mass again, only to be confronted with the WUSS module 3 PopwerPoint last Sunday.

These people said that they felt that the presentation treated them like they were “children”, and they found it insulting.

This is hardly the kind of thing we need if we are serious about trying to promote greater reverence for the Mass, form people in the faith or reach out to lapsed Catholics.

Now I don’t know much about the venture, or the people behind it, but I have been informed that a modified version of the WUSS module 3 PowerPoint presentation has actually been made available on the Internet for people to download.

I have had a look at it, and it is a massive improvement from the current version.

For example:

    The picture of the priests in vestments now says “priests vest”

    The picture of the priest carrying the Book of the Gospels now reads “Process the book of the Gospels”.

    And the picture of people receiving Communion now states: “Receive the Body and Blood of Christ”.

The whole thing is a massive improvement from the original as it explains what is actually happening in each part of the Mass, and it gives a basic catachesis of what we do with our bodies during Mass – in fact some of the slides now even clarify important things like where you are meant to genuflect towards when you enter the church.

Most welcome of all is the fact that the new presentation doesn’t come across as being childish, and it promotes greater dignity and reverence for the Mass.

Like I said, I don’t know much about this updated PowerPoint presentation, but I salute whoever has gone to the trouble of producing it.

Hopefully it will either lead to an official update of the old presentation, or maybe parishes might even adopt this new one when presenting module 3 to their parishioners.

Take a look at both versions (it’ll take you about 2 minutes for each) and let us know what you think.

You can view the original PowerPoint, and the updated version here

26
May

Loss of reverence…for what?

Have any of you out there noticed that we seem to have lost some of the reverence and mystery from our faith? That’s kind of rhetorical, as I’m sure some of the community has noticed this, but I wanted to broaden the question.

At Mass yesterday, on the feast of Corpus Christi, a number of eager young kids received the Sacrament of First Communion. Our parish priest gave a fantastic homily where he explained a number of things that they probably wouldn’t have known – on everything from what intinction is, to what altar rails are/were, to how people used to receive Communion (i.e. on their tongue). He spoke about all of these things in a very relevant, light-hearted way, which was great as it kept everyone listening…and that’s sometimes hard to do with kids! :) But as he progressed through his homily, I got increasingly depressed as the realisation dawned on me of just how much reverence we/I seem to have lost for the Eucharist.

Before I explain this, let me clarify a couple of things (for all those “box and dismiss” types):

1) I have never been to a Tridentine Mass
2) The only Latin I know is the Gloria and “Ave Maria” (not the whole prayer/song, just those two words! :) )
3) I am not old enough to have seen the Mass before Vatican II and am not calling for a return to it

So, take from that what you will. :)

But today, as our priest started to point out the differences between “then” (read: around 50 years ago) and “now”, there are a number of undeniable differences in how we treat Our Lord in the Eucharist.

Which of the two following scenarios sounds to you to be more reverent?

SCENARIO 1: Person approaches altar rail. Person kneels and prays. Priest and altar boy approach. Altar boy holds a gold plate under the person’s mouth as the priest presents the Eucharist. Person affirms that it is the Body of Christ with an “Amen”. Our Lord is placed on the tongue of the person with the gold plate there to catch even the tiniest crumb.

SCENARIO 2: Person approaches the sanctuary steps. Person holds out hands. Priest or extraordinary minister (i.e. another Person) presents the Eucharist. Person affirms that it is the Body of Christ with an “Amen”. Our Lord is placed in Person’s hands. Person then consumes Our Lord.

Now, I know that neither of these scenarios can possibly provide objective commentary on an person’s inner state of grace, but I suppose I’m just left wondering why we bothered to change this? I mean, getting rid of the altar rails, the kneeling, the reception on the tongue, only the priest handling the Eucharist – what value has this added to our Mass experience? Conversely, what problems has it introduced?

I have written a little before about the lost treasures of Tradition, I don’t want to rehash that too much…or do I? ;) I have conservatively received Communion over a thousand times. When I think of the other things that I have done in the thousands of times, they have pretty much all become routine. I really, really, REALLY don’t want the source and summit of my faith to become like brushing my teeth! :)

But routine aside, can someone please give me a good case for why we bothered to go through all the rigmarole of changing things around anyway? I commented to a (female) friend of mine yesterday on the amount of effort that has been taken to gender-neutralise some of our songs – “Take and Eat” with “unless the Father beckons” rather than “unless the Father calls him”. Why? Why go to all that effort over something so…small? Our parish priest was referring to when they lifted the old carpet on the sanctuary steps to replace it, they found the holes that used to hold the altar rails – again, why bother removing them?

I just don’t get it. If you do, can you explain it for me? Because from where I sit, it seems to me that we’ve just changed for the sake of change – these changes don’t add any value (that I can see). Please, either help me see the value so I feel all this was worthwhile, or explain to me why it’s important to change for the sake of change.

Thanks in advance! :)

25
May

Is there value in a building?

Pope Benedict recently said on the opening of a new Church “Especially in our broadly secularized social context, the parish is a beacon that radiates the light of the faith and thus responds to the deepest and truest desires of the human heart, giving meaning and hope to the lives of individuals and families…Dear brothers and sisters, we have dedicated a church – a building in which God and man desire to meet: a house that unites us, in which we are attracted to God, and being with God unites us with one another.”  

It seems that “buildings” are often a point of contention between the Catholic Church and “reformed” Christians that want to make Christianity ‘relatable’ and see buildings as signs of boredom, wealth, and perhaps even symbols of a corrupt Church history.  

What do you see when you see the beauty of a Church spire of a Cathedral in the middle of powerful looking office buildings standing as if shrines to our market economy.   Something slightly more inspiring perhaps?    

Christianity is hardly about wealth.   Jesus’ career choice was that of a carpenter.   It was an entirely new idea that someone might be the king of kings, yet also practice a very ordinary trade.   The Christian perspective was the very opposite of everything practiced by the Romans.   People who valued loving one’s neighbour above amassing wealth and property were hardly the norm at the time.   We honour the  many Christian  men and women  who have  lived before  us  that made vows of poverty and lived simple lives dedicated to God  - St Francis, Mother Theresa, the many priests and orders  that live today without property of their own, but have  total dependence on a life dedicated to God.

But Christianity also showed its values through art and architecture.   Finally the talents of some of the most  acclaimed stone masons, poets, musicians, and painters, who once were only called to celebrate victories in war and “market” the leader of the day, were being used to praise activities such as offering charity and looking out for the poor; their works preaching  God’s message  to the masses.   This is not meaningless wealth but an amazing web of history which illustrates the emphasis peoples throughout history have put on glorifying their God and the values of the Christian Church stemming from the apostles and Jesus.  

The early Christians created artwork and cathedrals that kept God at the forefront of the city landscape.   Remember, paintings, sculptures, statues, artwork, and stories are significantly more important in a world without books or even photographs.    Church buildings  provided an environment where city people going about their day’s work and people from every walk of life could have their minds lifted to God’s love.   That is the function of a cathedral. For people (who didn’t have bibles to read at the time) pictures inside the building told the story of Jesus and reminded them of His teachings through paintings, stained glass windows and ceilings rich with artwork.  

How can this all be irrelevant and boring today?  

The Catechism of the Catholic Church states “visible churches are not simply gathering places but signify and make visible the Church living in this place, the dwelling of God with men reconciled and united in Christ” (paragraph 1180).  

Michael Rose, an architect, states this of Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris:   “It will be transcendent — of time, place, and culture — through its inherent qualities of goodness, beauty and truth, all put at the service of God and bringing man into an intimacy with his creator. In the end, it is a catalyst for the earthly pilgrim on his journey to the eternal  Kingdom of Heaven above.”  

So while our faith is not about wealth or buildings, practically Church buildings can be used to help everyone in the community see something of God.   From my own personal experience of working in the middle of the city in a tall office building, seeing the beauty of St Patricks cathedral in the distance out the window has often provided me with the inspiration to get through the afternoon.