Last Tuesday night I went to the debate between Dr William Craig, (a world renowned Christian apologist who was touring New Zealand this week) and the atheist, humanist leader of the Rationalist Society. It was held at the impressive new Auckland University business school.
The thought provoking debate brought faith in God alive in a scientific and rational manner. Dr Craig articulately presented well thought out and rational arguments for God’s existence. A highly educated man, it seemed he had a convincing answer for every question the audience could throw at him, as well as every argument the other esteemed and eloquent Doctor debating him could think of.
I was a little disappointed the atheist doctor (I’m sorry I cannot remember his name) could not present better rebuttal to Dr Craig’s arguments. He didn’t really argue on the debate topic of proving God does not exist.
Although atheist, his main sentiment appeared to be that we cannot know whether there is a God or not, or know his nature if there is such a God. Accordingly, we may as well not waste our time thinking about such useless things. Instead we should worry about all the problems in the world such as starvation and wars, many caused by fighting about religion.
He further argued we have no objective meaning as human beings. We will die and that is the end of our meaningless existence. However, in the context of overall meaningless, we are able to create our own purpose and meaning. He seemed eager for the audience to realise that atheists are not evil people, and do have morals, but our moral fibre is merely developed through a mutual need humans have to depend on each over for their survival and comfort.
Doctor Craig, having a doctorate in cosmology, argued that it is scientifically and rationally necessary that there is a God. It is impossible that something be created out of nothing. It is interesting how many top scientists start believing in a God when they realise how intricately complex human existence is.
Furthermore, there can be no objective moral standards or right and wrong if there is no God. Yet we all have consciences and feel guilt. He also said the early Christians had no need of scientific proof because they had a personal relationship with God. We, as Christians, know God exists because we have personal experience of him in our lives. Many people have seen healings through prayer and other things only explained by God in our lives. He also made many other convincing arguments, and made the atheist position appear quite unreasoned I thought. However, I am no substitute for hearing the words from Dr Craig’s own mouth.
It was heartening to see there is a strong interest in debating and thinking about God among students and the hundreds of others who attended. The debate was originally scheduled for a small lecture room but was moved to a large lecture theatre due to huge interest. Then Auckland University had to set up four more live feeds from other packed lecture rooms nearby for the overflow of people.
What arguments for and against a God struck others? Or why do you believe in a God?
Doctor Craig concluded that you are perfectly within your rational and intellectual rights to believe in God. Mere Christianity by C S Lewis (also author of the Narnia series) is a good book for those struggling with the initial question of “is there a God’.
On the subject of faith and reason it is worth noting famous Roman Catholic academics include:
Nicolaus Copernicus – a priest (in astronomy)
Blaise Pascal (a lay apologist) in mathematics
Gregor Mendel ( a monk) in genetics.
Louis Pasteur in biology
Antoine Lavoisier in chemistry
John von Neumann in computer science
Enrico Fermi and Erwin Schrodinger in physics.







Recent Comments