Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for September, 2008



23
Sep

Gay lifestyle a “Sewer” of casual degrading sex, drug abuse and misery

A British homosexual journalist admits that his documentary on the London gay scene is likely to “burn every bridge in the gay world I’ve got.”

Simon Fanshawe is a writer and broadcaster who created the documentary “The Trouble With Gay Men” after becoming increasingly alarmed at the shallowness and destructiveness of the “gay lifestyle.” The film, made for BBC 3 television, questions the emotional and psychological immaturity, narcissism, nihilism and self-destructive tendencies of many in the homosexual community. Fanshawe says he wants homosexual men to “grow up” and get beyond their state of “extended adolescence.”

Fanshawe, who was involved in the early homosexualist political movement, says, “We’ve fought discrimination and prejudice, only to wreck ourselves with drugs and wild sex.”

In his documentary Fanshawe admits that the homosexualist movement has in the main achieved its political goals of equalising homosexuality with natural sexual relations, in abolishing laws against sodomy and creating legal equivalency with marriage and adoption. Given these achievements, Fanshawe asks, “Why do we seem hell bent on behaving like eternal teenagers?”

“We’re hooked on vanity, and regard older men with contempt. Despite AIDS we’re still chasing the ultimate sexual high and what’s more are determined to wreck ourselves on designer drugs. We’re happy to assist the straight world in keeping alive the image of all gay men as limp-wristed queens.”

He says that he has recently “started to worry” about the ways in which “gay liberation is celebrated” in his hometown of Brighton, a major centre of the homosexual subculture. At the annual “Mr. Gay” beauty pageant, which he describes as a “pathetic display of self-delusion”, Fanshawe tells a contestant, “I’m old enough to remember when all those women were fighting against Miss World…What we’re all saying about ourselves is that actually to be really gay, properly gay, what you’ve got to be is cute, and young.”

“Extreme vanity” he says, has been “sewn into gay culture.” It “is now so mainstream in the gay community that otherwise intelligent young men are happy to be treated as sex objects on a demeaning meat rack.”

Gay men, he says, are so “hardwired” towards finding casual sexual encounters, some going as far as plastic implants to enhance their appearance, that finding genuine intimacy is “practically impossible.”

“Vast amounts of our leisure time are organised around sex, straight or gay. But what gay men have done is organise our identity around sex. And that is corrosive. And to make things worse, promiscuity has become the norm.”

The documentarian asks the proprietor of a gay sex bath house, “Paul”, who had just related some graphic stories of group sexual encounters in the establishment, “Are we just swimming around in a sewer which we’re just sort of saying is normal?”

For objecting to the lifestyle of pursuing casual and “extreme” sex and for holding genuine human intimacy as a goal, Paul told Fanshawe that he is “the closest thing to a straight person in a gay man’s body I have ever met. There should be an operation for you, dear.”

Paul was adamant and forthright in his belief that the gay lifestyle is incompatible with happiness and fidelity in human relations, expressing his dissatisfaction with civil unions legislation. “The temptation of other things will always stand in the way of two gay men having a long-term, loving, caring relationship.”

Fanshawe says he is horrified at the lack of emotional involvement and at the willingness of men to engage in “unsafe sex.” The film includes statistics that show the deadly consequences of the homosexual lifestyle. One in nine gay men in London is HIV infected and new cases of HIV have doubled in the city in five years. Incidences of syphilis have increased in the same time period 616 per cent.

“Unsafe” sex, he says, is not the only way in which gay men are self destructive. “If there’s a new drug, gay men will find it and take it,” he states.

At one point Fanshawe interviews a homosexual man who has “done all the drugs” and now campaigns in gay clubs against the growing use of crystal methamphetamine. The man, who could not be identified for fear of reprisals from drug dealers, said that crystal meth is preferred in the gay community because it reduces the inhibitions and allows sex to be brought to an “animalistic” level “devoid of emotion.” The film says that one in five gay men in London use crystal meth.

This story can be found in its original form here.

22
Sep

Extermination

I’d like to take a break from politics, if possible. ;) This is despite one of the seeds to this week’s post coming from a very interesting article in the Washington Times about Obama vs. McCain and their pro-life stances (or lack thereof).

The seed to which I refer is this paragraph:

However, this reasoning violates church doctrine. Pope Benedict XVI has made it crystal-clear that abortion is the seminal moral challenge of our time. It is not simply a “single” issue like guns, taxes or immigration. It is equivalent to the Jewish question of the 1930s: Will we allow an entire category of people – the unborn – to be murdered because they are viewed as less than human?

I’ve only just managed to watch the video Ox linked to last week, and wow is right! I mean, surviving an abortion!?!? I feel like I am waking up and something which I hoped was a bad dream (namely, abortion) is actually true, and far worse than I dreamed. :(

Since I can’t vote in the States, I’m going to do my best to avoid any future debates about which candidate is the best (I said try ;) ), and our political situation has me a little weary right now, but I am not going to go quietly on the whole anti-abortion stuff because I really think that many of you reading this may be in a similar situation to where I have been: namely, a good, born-and-bred Catholic who always thought abortion was wrong, but who has never really explored just how wrong this is.

I remember asking my late, saintly grandmother about WWII. Specifically, I asked how she and her friends down here in lil ol’ NZ felt about all the atrocities that were going on during the war. “Oh James dear”, she replied, “we had no idea what was going on! Most news took months to reach us, and we really new nothing about the extent of what was happening in Germany.”

Which makes total sense, given the communication technology of the time, and the Nazis’ approach to things.

I only bring this up because the sick feeling in my stomach that has been developing as I’ve recently explored the reality of abortion is unlike anything I have experienced before…with the exception of the first time I saw the photos of the death camps in Germany.

Will my grandchildren be asking me in fifty years what I and my friends thought about the systematic slaughter of millions of babies as it was going on “back then”? If they do, what should my reply be? I can’t argue that we didn’t know about it.

:(

21
Sep

Election? What election?

There has been a lot of talk of world politics and New Zealand politics, but do young people even care? The Electoral Commission reported in May that only 47% of young people knew it was election year.

Many of us perceive politics as boring, politicians self-serving, and are cynical as to whether our vote will really make any difference. Or we just think all the parties are bad, fight amongst themselves, and deciding who the best of the bad bunch are is not worth the time. Do we even feel like our government represents us like it’s supposed to? Or is it a bunch of people running round with their own separate agendas? It does cross my mind that no really normal person would want to be in politics anyway, so it attracts a certain kind of person. I don’t think it helps that recently the government seems to have pushed through a lot of change that was contrary to public opinion.

Or do we just switch off to the constant stream of information overload we get on billboards, radio ads, television, internet, papers, text messages, emails – I just want some time to relax after work really without anybody selling me an ideology, product or burger (your particular problem it seens Beardie).

It seems that you have to decide what issues are most important to you and choose according to that, because it’s unlikely you will like everything about any one political party’s policies.

The bishop’s statements are helpful, as are the Pope’s comments though in helping make decisions, and seem to suggest it is a bit irresponsible to not care at all! I particularly like this:

“Our lives are involved with one another, through innumerable interactions they are linked together. No one lives alone. No one sins alone. No one is saved alone. The lives of others continually spill over into mine: in what I think, say, do and achieve. And conversely, my life spills over into that of others: for better or worse.” (Pope Benedict XVI, Spe Salvi, 28)

In not so many words that’s really saying ‘love your neighbour as yourself’ or ‘love one another as I have loved you’ – obviously the core message of Jesus.

So if we have a duty to do that, maybe we should think a little more carefully about our responsibilities to others in the way we vote – our responsibilities to such things as life, prisoners, the environment, families, poorer countries and the way we think about our own economy. And at least take some responsibility for our vote. Even if politicians are an odd bunch… :-)

20
Sep

The Politics of Feminism

Like I said already on Captain’s post on Thursday, good on Sarah Palin! I may not agree with her Republican tendencies – I’d prefer a left-wing government with a strong pro-life and pro-family stance. But as we all know, I don’t think that is going to happen anytime soon! On a side note, I have always found the lack of morally sound left-leaning politicians astounding and frustrating, might I add. Regardless, Palin has got to be admired. I quickly scanned the liberal media this morning to see if I could gauge what feminists were saying about Palin. Ofcourse, you have the dreary and tiresome accounts of feminists who can’t get past the fact that Palin is staunchly pro-life. They can’t seem to comprehend on any level how a feminist could possibly be pro-life. Unfortunately, these accounts tend to dominate. On occasion one finds a gem in feminist journalism – a woman who is actually willing to dialogue with pro-life feminists, regardless of the fact that she herself is pro-abortion. This week that prize goes to Camille Paglia. Now look before you start ripping into me, I don’t agree with most of what she says but you got to hand it to the woman for two reasons.

Firstly, she has redefined Feminism – it shouldn’t be closed off to women who don’t necessarily hold the same opinion on reproductive issues especially abortion. She asserts “Feminism, which should be about equal rights and equal opportunity, should not be a closed club requiring an ideological litmus test for membership.” For this reason, I think she is a woman who a new feminist could dialogue with.

Secondly, interesting enough she has actually come out and admitted that abortion is murder. She states:

“Let’s take the issue of abortion rights, of which I am a firm supporter. As an atheist and libertarian, I believe that government must stay completely out of the sphere of personal choice. Every individual has an absolute right to control his or her body,” said Paglia, voicing the commonest argument put forward by feminist supporters of abortion. Unlike her fellow pro-abortion colleagues, however, Paglia continued on to – as she termed it – “face the ethical consequences” of embracing abortion. “I have always frankly admitted that abortion is murder, the extermination of the powerless by the powerful,”

I tell you, that’s a rarity in abortion-advocating feminist circles. Of course, she got her priorities mixed up – the right to life is inalienable – we should NEVER accept such a twisted compromise for the so-called greater good.

I know of another prominent feminist who taught woman’s studies in Boston, who like Paglia was open to the opinions of pro-life and pro-family feminists. She ended up converting to Catholicism (and the new feminism) after a student in one of her classes was brave enough to write an essay refuting everything she said – Elizabeth Fox-Genovese. Hopefully, Paglia will be lucky enough to encounter someone as brave as Fox-Genovese’s student – maybe she too will see the light.

As for Palin, I may not think that she has as much political experience as Obama, or personally support the economic or social policies of the Republican party but she’s got my vote – it’s refreshing to have a strong pro-family feminist voice in US politics for a change.

19
Sep

“No children have ever meddled with the Republican Party and lived to tell about it.”

After reading the Captain’s post yesterday and the following responses , I have decided to shelve my explosive expose on Barack Obama’s running mate, Joe Biden (whose name escaped me until Mr. Greg Bourke mentioned him yesterday). Just count yourselves lucky that we have a great deputy PM like Michael Cullen.

Anyway I saw an ad sometime during the week, that really brought home to me how destructive mankind is and how much pain and suffering we as humans can cause each other. It’s actually staggering to think what humankind will do to each other in order to make a profit, or for some other sort of gain.

The ad I refer to is one for the Wendy’s Triple Cheese Baconator. For those that live outside of Auckland and were not fortunate enough to have seen this advert, this burger has two meat patties, slices of cheddar cheese, smoked cheese, and swiss cheese, six strips of bacon, mayonnaise, and ketchup. I hear it only just missed getting the Heart Foundation tick, but it was close. I think the Kaiser bun pushed it over the edge… Whose idea was it to release this on an unsuspecting and already dangerously overweight public?

With so little regard for the well being of our fellow man/woman, it’s little wonder there’s so much conflict and greed in the world.

18
Sep

What do we want from our pollys?

Now, I’m not usually in the business of taking what movie stars say seriously but I did have a mighty chuckle this week at Matt Damon’s criticism of Sarah Palin. Then I had a read/surf of t’internet to find out a bit about this lass.

Blow me down if I wasn’t exceeeeeeedingly unimpressed by said VP candidate. What a nincompoop. I mean, I’m not running for VP of the USA so I can’t testify to the pressures of having to answer a range of questions on a range of issues. But, once again, I’m not running for VP of the USA. This twit is.

Apparently, all Sarah Palin’s achieved in her political career is “reform”. And because the USA needs reform, she must be the logical choice! Woohoo! Turns out 1+1 does in fact equal an idiotic choice.

Here’s the thing I’ve been chewing over. What do we expect from leaders? Religious, political and otherwise? Do we want them to fit with our moral code? What among our moral code takes precedence?

Palin’s staunchly anti-abortion. As am I. Woopdefrickendoo. Does that mean her apparent inability to perform in a number of other areas, many of which I would consider to be vital to running a superpower, matter not? Should the same be said for our election? That the official who shows the most pro-choice policy is by nature the best choice? Give me a break. God gave us brains and free thought – why on Earth don’t we use them?

Palin is pants. And that’s all I have to say about that for now.

17
Sep

A little bit of navel-gazing…the Enneagram

I live in a great community and last night was community meeting time. Always loved and loathed, a chance to check in and re-connect, but also the potential for a long night in debating how the tea towels should be hung or whether it’s warm enough to turn the heatpumps off.

However, last night, we took some time to look at the results of the Myers Briggs Personality test. I’d never done one of these before and I was particularly impressed by how well I felt that my ‘type’ described my own preferences. Of course, it’s not something to base your life on, and you can’t get hung up thinking that you’re ‘stuck’ in a certain way…but it is quite revealing, and somewhat reassuring to realize that, no, you really do just operate totally different to this other community member who you struggled to understand.

However, in the last couple weeks, a number of people around me have commented on how Myers Briggs is limited in comparison to the depth and methods of the Enneagram. The Enneagram seems like one of those many things that looks really good and can provide some fascinating insights, but used blindly or without knowledge of it’s origins, could lead us down a garden path that we don’t want to go.

I was aware that the Enneagram had gotten quite a bit of bad press and so I dug a little deeper and found this from A Brief (haha, yeah right) Report on the Origins of the Enneagram from the US Catholic Bishops’ Conference.

For example, in enneagram teaching sin is often redefined in terms of the characteristic limitations of a particular personality type. One problem resulting from this redefinition derives from the fact that according to enneagram teaching every person must inevitably choose a personality type as a basic strategy for coping with one’s environment. Since every personality type has its intrinsic limitations, sin becomes something at least in part inevitable. Personal responsibility for sin becomes very difficult to explain in this theory. A second problem is a consequence of the first. If sin is the (inevitable) result of one personality type, then the solution to sin is to be found primarily in compensating for one personality type by following the prescriptions of enneagram teaching. The remedy for sin becomes first of all a matter of greater knowledge rather than reform of the will. According to Christian teaching, sin is indeed unhealthy behavior and can be combated by an improved understanding, but it is at its root a moral problem, so that repentance before God and one’s neighbor must be the fundamental response. Enneagram teaching thus obscures the Christian understanding of sin.

This is a major concern, among a number of other things mentioned, about the Enneagram.

However…would it be possible to “take the good and leave the rest” as a great priest I know would say? I guess the issue is that so many Catholics who do make use of the Enneagram, who introduce it to others etc, do not (deliberately or not) stipulate clearly how it fits in with our own Christian understanding of the faith.

So what if someone did do that, and sought the good bits, clearly outlining the not so crash hot…does anyone see potential here?