I read an article leading up the US elections about something known as the Bradley Effect – you can read all about it here – and now that the US people have elected the media sponsored Barack Obama as President, I have come up with some “effects” of my own that I think will be part and parcel of his time in office.
The Dickens effect…
Charles Dickens was the author of Great Expectations, and basically the US people elected Obama because they have been led to believe that all their great expectations would be fulfilled by the great Obama – sadly the end result is more likely to be a Hard Times and Bleak House (both Dickens novels) situation, finally ending with an Oliver Twist (yes, another novel by Charles Dickens) situation, where at the end of his tenure as President, the US people will be left asking “please sir, may I have some more?” because of the fact that Obama has failed to deliver on his utopian and messianic election promises.
The Murray Mexted effect…
There is no doubting that Obama is an excellent orator, and just like Murray Mexted, many people love to hear him waxing lyrical on live broadcasts, which is why he has gained so much popularity – but just like Murray Mexted, much of what Obama has to say is actually nothing more than hot air and meaningless puffery.
Let me give you some examples, firstly from Murray Mexted…
“Well, either side could win it, or it could be a draw.”
“Strangely, in slow motion replay, the ball seemed to hang in the air for even longer.”
“Both sides are here to play rugby.”
“It’s all tied up at 14-13″
Now, here are some examples from Obama…
“I think when you spread the wealth around its good for everybody.”
“If you’re walking down the right path and you’re willing to keep walking, eventually you’ll make progress.”
“Why can’t I just eat my waffle?”
“I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go.”
SIDE NOTE: There are only fifty states in the US, and before you ask; no, he wasn’t trying to make a joke – see here for details
The Mandela effect…
On a more serious note, I do actually believe that the election of Barack Obama has some similarities to the election of Nelson Mandela in South Africa in 1994.
Firstly, there was a lot of hype about the Mandela presidency and what it would mean for South Africa, and how it was the dawning of a bright new era for that part of the world, but sadly South Africa is now in more of a mess than it was before.
Please understand that I firmly believe that apartheid was gravely immoral and that it had to be abolished, and I have a lot of respect for many of Mandela’s efforts to fight the racist apartheid system (I have no time for the terrorist acts he carried out as head of the ANC’s Umkhonto we Sizwe militia unit though).
Mandela was a popular hero in South Africa who ended up becoming a great spokesman and a powerful figurehead for the anti- apartheid cause – the problem is that being a great figurehead for a political cause does not automatically make you a great political leader.
The end result was that the much hyped Mandela presidency (once again, the hype came mainly from the media) actually ended up delivering very little of any substance for the South African people. South Africa is now in a social, political and financial mess, and with each passing day it is looking more and more like many of its poorer corupt African neighbours who have battled to maintain social and political stability for generations now.
Like I said, apartheid was unjust and it had to be abolished, and there were always going to be social problems after such a sustained and overwhelming oppression of persons in South Africa, but the problem was that while Mandela may have been the popular choice, his popularity didn’t actually do a lot to establish a bright new era for South Africa.
I think the same will be true of Obama.
He is already showing this by the appointments he is making to his new government.
After all the pre-election talk of “being the change” and a new and different way of doing politics, he is now showing his true colours and simply appointing people to senior positions who offer no change at all – instead they are politically more of the same old, same old.
One of Obama’s first appointments was Chief of Staff, which he gave to Rahm Emanuel – a man who publically stated that he would have invaded Iraq even if he definitely knew that there were no weapons of mass destruction there beforehand – and as of a few days ago Obama was mooting the possibility of a senior position for Hillary Clinton in his new government.
If people think this is the start of a new and changed era of American politics they are seriously deluding themselves.
Another interesting parallel is that Mandela ushered in, and then presided over, one of the most pro-abortion governments of its time – and just like US under Obama, International Planned Parenthood and others had a huge say in the drawing up of the new South African policy documents under Mandela.
Recent Comments