Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for May, 2009



25
May

Moving…

Sorry for this post being put up so late – I was moving flats yesterday and somehow completely forgot to do this before midday!

I am moving to live with two Catholics after living with two non-denominational Christians, and two guys after living with two girls.. two interesting changes!

I learnt a lot from living with my last two flat mates about Catholicism – it’s only when you’re rubbed up against people who don’t agree with you on everything that you’re forced to really think whether you agree with you! But of course our similarities are alway much greater than our differences – in fact we have never really seen ourselves as all that different.

In the last few years, through a few friends that have really challenged me, I have solidified and learnt so much about Catholic doctrine and the reasons for it – especially the common apologetics topics and differences like Mary, the saints, the Eucharist, faith vs faith and works, what their concept of ‘saved’ is… etc. etc. – that’s something that often rubs me the wrong way actually – people talking about whether people are ‘saved’ – surely we don’t know whether someone we just meet is saved because they tell us they believe in Jesus and Christianity! And do we know if we’re ‘saved’ before we die anyway?

So now I think I might move into a different phase of learning in my life – the differences between the feminine genius and the male of the species :-)

23
May

Our Holy Father – Internets Master!

Just when the world thought the Catholic Church was ‘out of touch’ with society, too ‘old fashioned’, that Church for ‘old people’, our Holy Father gives this address on spreading the gospel through the internet-Bene and the Internets . And you thought the pope wasn’t ‘hip’ enough to know that ‘new technologies have brought about fundamental shifts in the ways in which news and information are disseminated and in how people communicate and relate to each other.’ Well, boy were you wrong!! Our Holy Father is a master of the internets!

Just to show you how much of a master he is, this week, ahead of the World Communications Day, the new website pope2you.net designed to help young people bring the gospel to the world through the internet was launched. It is designed to help our Holy Father “speak to young people to bring the message of hope and joy.” The website is complete with a Facebook application to receive messages and addresses form the pope, an application for your Iphone and Ipod, and a link to the official Vatican You Tube channel! Heck yes, bring on the digital age of the Church!

Good on the Holy Father for seeking out the young people where they are as well. It became appearent to me at World You Day that Pope Benedict was a pope of the younger generation. It was incredibly warming to see the hundreds of thousands of young people proclaiming the gospel in Sydney. The one phrase that has stuck with me though, hearing it chanted by all the young people throughout the streets during the week, ‘Bene Bene Bene, Oi Oi Oi’, helped me realise how much the younger generation of Catholics love our Holy Father. Now, he is seeking them in the midst of the world, reaching out to them through a means that they embrace. I can’t wait to see more endevours like this start to spring up.

ALong the same lines, a shameless plug for the Spoke Project here in New Zealand. It is an ambitious endeavour to bring the New Zealand Catholic world online. Check it out.

22
May

“We live in a society of laws. Why do you think I took you to all those ‘Police Academy’ movies?”

You know sometimes I wonder why the Catholic Church or Catholics in general are derided and ridiculed in the media. I wonder why the world doesn’t seem to take the Church, the work its trying to do, and its teachings seriously. I wonder why some Catholics seem disinterested in or disillusioned by what they are. Then events of the past week serve as some kind of reminder.

First there was Obama’s honorary degree (or whatever it was) from Notre Dame University, apparently a prestigious Catholic university. Now I know as Catholics we’re supposed to live as part of, and not apart, from the world. But honouring someone who’s personal beliefs are at odds with what the Church is supposed to be teaching and standing for seems a bit of a stretch. Oh sure we’re supposed to be inclusive and charitable and turn the other cheek but when are we going to start making a stand? How likely would it be for someone who is at odds with fundamental teachings with say Islam being invited to a prestigious Islamic institution and honoured?

And the Irish abuse scandal. Can’t really say anymore about that. How it was allowed to go on for so long boggles the mind. I just a common lay person and don’t understand the machinations of Church hierarchy, but surely they couldn’t have thought something this bad could have been hidden forever. And I don’t understand how the religious involved could have even contemplated doing these things in the first place. They were men and women of God but yet mistreating children was considered to be ok? Was it the power inherent in their roles? The ability to play God as it were? I just don’t understand.

I guess it’s hard for the world to take us seriously when they see something that is so flawed, indecisive, and contradictory. That’s what happens when you leave something good to humans I suppose.

21
May

I never really thought about it like that

I stumbled across this article this week from Mercatornet on the economic woes of gambling. It seems this blog’s “Fav” president has incorporated the gambling industry into the 800 million dollar bailout. The author lays out a pretty convincing argument for why investing in the gambling industry is a fairly bad idea, particularly considering the economically unstable environment.

Considering it’s socially woes, I’ve never been a fan of gambling myself. Some of my friends, on the other hand, gamble recreationally now and then. However, I don’t know if gambling is that morally legitimate – its social woes seem to by far outweigh it social positives. Firstly, the odds are always against the “customer” – I’m sure you all know about the unfavourable probability of the whole affair. Secondly, the prevalence of addition.

I was also thinking today about the harm it could possibly do to the human person both in cases where a person gets addicted and where people manage to just indulge in gambling recreationally.
- addicts become socially reclusive and relationships tend to break down as a result (that is true of any addiction I think….accept perhaps smoking)
- Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t gambling promote a kind of materialism, even if it is just recreational? – all that thinking of money (or potential money) can’t be positive in an environment that is geared toward materialism anyway.
- The other big complaint I have is that it seems to be an utter waste of time… shouldn’t we be engaging in activity that helps the human person to thrive not socially suffocate?
Lastly, there is something particularly airy and insidious that casino’s deliberately provide no natural light in the gaming areas so as to downplay the passing of time….

Does the Church have a position on gambling? Maybe I’ll look it up when I haven’t got a dissertation due in a week.

20
May

No Regrets

I have a dear friend and she comes from a Hindu background, however doesn’t consider herself Hindu…her mother devout, her father a bit agnostic about it all. Herself also. She has said to me on occasion “Tuppence (well, not my pseudonym, but you get it…), ya know, I wish I’d worked these things out earlier in life…now I’m a bit older (late 20s, oh please, that’s not old) you just get on this treadmill, and yet haven’t worked out the why…” “The why of what?” “Just, ya know, the meaning of it all…”

She’s a fascinating person too – works very hard, can laugh at herself, is attracted to big questions, entertained by simplicity and sensitive to the depth of the human person. She’s genuinely intrigued by my faith, in fact outrightly envious of the fact that this foundational aspect of my life provides me such strength and ‘comfort’ (we have yet to discuss Ignatius’ concept of spiritual desolation and the dark night of the soul…save that for later!). Anyway, yesterday, she was saying “Ya know, Tuppence, sometimes I look back and I feel more regret than pleasure with what I’ve done in my life…I often wish I could be 20 again and start with a blank slate…take more opportunities…in fact… (and this is where her brilliance shines, and she provides me with blog topics…cheers!)

“…Tuppence, what does the bible or catholicism, say about regret?”

I thought, being only one, meagre, inadequate, darkened mind, that I would pose that question to this infinitely richer forum where some could provide better commentary. Starting from the dictionary, regret as a verb is a) to feel sorrow or remorse for (an act, fault, disappointment, etc.) and b) to think of with a sense of loss. While there’s plenty of examples of public ‘regret’ – even the Holy Father has recently expressed regret about polemics and misunderstandings surrounding his lifting of an excommunication for four traditionalist bishops – however, I’m more thinking of regret on a much more personal level, the sense of regret regarding large life choices, regrets that can stay like a constant dull pain.

Does scripture say anything about regret? Does the Church say anything about regret specifically? What is regret, compared to say contrition? What is the role of regret after reconciliation? Are regrets good, bad, or does it depend on how they influence our future behaviour? These might sound like basic questions…but I’m intrigued.

In it’s extreme form, does regret suggest a certain despair about that which one has done, such that one believes they’re not worthy of being saved, or that nothing or no One could save them?

How is regret connected to guilt? And what for guilt? If Catholics have got an unfortunate reputation for anything, possibly guilt is one of the most unfair and misunderstood. Just yesterday I had someone who didn’t know I was Catholic (in fact, an Episcopalian Republican from the US military, who has served in Iraq, is pro-civil unions and fiercely proud that his bishop is gay…try putting him in a box!)…who wanted to make sure he distanced himself from anything like those catholics – “ya know, with all the guilt, and the you have to do this and you have to do that…we just want to take people where they’re at, I guess a bit like Bob Marley…(being that his birthday was last week and all…big deal in Africa)…” ANYWAY, I digress…

Regret…help me out here folks.

19
May

A mixed bag today…

A couple of things…

1. When are the liturgical NZ restrictions going to be lifted?

It has been almost three weeks since they were implemented, and since that time the media panic has disappeared, so when are we going to see these restrictions lifted now that they are no longer required?

2. What’s up with the media and Christine Rankin?

Remember when Ian Wishart published details about Helen Clark’s public statements that she cried on the day she got married because she didn’t want to get married, and she stated that marriage was a “necessary evil” and the only reason she got married was because she knew that her political career would be harmed if she didn’t have a marriage?

And remember how many people in the mainstream media slammed Wishart for doing such a despicable thing?

Well why the heck are the very same media outlets now doing exactly the same thing to Christine Rankin?!

4. Obama/Notre Dame scandal an absolute disgrace

He came, he saw and he conquered.

Notre Dame’s decision to award an honorary degree to Obama – the most pro-abortion president in US history – is a shameful disgrace and a real victory for the culture of death, and it was carried out by a Catholic priest on a Catholic campus.

I think that Jenkins has to be sacked – his conduct during sever major scandals at Notre Dame (remember the disgraceful Vagina Monologues incident?) has been anything but consistent with true Catholicism, and his rebellious rejection of the rules and wishes of the US Bishops shows how out of touch with true Catholicism he actually is.

Remember, this award was given to the most pro-abortion president in US history, and before he has actually done anything worth being awarded for.

In fact, one other US university, who recently hosted Obama, didn’t actually bestow an honorary degree on him because, as they rightly point out, he hasn’t actual been in office long enough to have done anything worthy of such an honour!

Good one Notre Dame – not only did you honour someone who opposes the right of unborn babies to be protected from surgical murder; you did it for no good reason.

Grave, scandal, immoral, shameful, co-operation with the culture of death, are all appropriate descriptions of what has happened here – shame on you Notre Dame.

Sadly, this sort of diabolical serpentry is simply the tip of a massive crisis that effects Catholic education worldwide.

18
May

20 week insight

My wife and I recently went to the 20-week scan of our second child.  Without turning this into a personal family blog, I would like to briefly talk about the sonographer (I think that’s his job title?) who performed the scan.  This guy was a pro.  Top of his game.  The way he approached the scan; the commentary he provided; the excitement, wonder, awe and joy he presented as he told us what he was doing – all was brilliant.

I raise this because (plug alert!) on the latest episode of the 15th Station, the topic of the recent ruling by the Health and Disability Commissioner on the right for a woman seeking an abortion to view the scan of the child came up.  Now, I think this is a great ruling, but I wonder how much difference it will actually make.  Because, you see, the sonographer we had for our scan struck me as the kind of guy who wouldn’t go near a job like that.  He seemed to be too much in awe of what he was seeing on the black and white screen.  To think that the woman to whom he was explaining with such care and detail what was going on would probably go on to kill that creation – well, I just can’t see it.

But, then again, I would have to say that if such a woman had a sonographer like him – so excited, and interested, and joyful – then she would have to reconsider what she was about to do.  Yet, when there are more than enough supervising consultants making tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars a year approving abortions in this country, why bother offering something that might take away some of the income stream?  We are in a recession after all.

I’m being only slightly facetious.  I am simply staggered that there are people out there making this kind of money out of killing children.  Face facts people – there is an abortion industry out there, one which the average Joe on the street doesn’t want to think about because it’s “icky” and “not my business”, and one which the more I find out about, the angrier I get!

Notre Dame University and their invitation to Obama is simply the latest example of this issue bubbling to the surface.  But I think we have an obligation to do exactly that – surface this for what it is.  An international shame.  A crime against humanity.  Something which must be stopped.

And, I have to say, I agree with the spirit of what Joy Cowley is saying in the latest NZ Catholic about there being two sides to every abortion.  So, as a man, I am calling out to all other men – this is not a women’s rights issue.  This is something that we all need to be aware of.  Don’t just brush it under the carpet, or put it in the too-hard basket.  Resist the urge that may be there to shrug the whole thing off as being too big and too complicated to do anything about!  WE need to start educating and shaping our fellow men on the responsibility that comes with – not just being fathers – but that comes with having sex.

I mean that.  Let’s get back to the root cause of the problem here – how many abortions would there be if sex was only within marriage, between two people who loved each other unconditionally and who were excited about life and bringing it into this world?  Care to hazard a guess?  ;)

That’s what I think we need to strive for: a worldwide rediscovery by men of what God intends sex to be.  The misunderstandings, perversions, de-spiritualising, de-humanising efforts of our half of the species need to be undone…and fast.  Before any more of our future brothers die needlessly.