Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for August, 2009

31
Aug

New media, new apostles…new responsibilities!

It has been a while since I was late with a post – says something about just how much I have on at the moment I guess. :)

Anywho, I just wanted to take a quick break from our normal programming (I think there is plenty to discuss in eyeWitness’ post from yesterday!) and talk a little bit about new media and the upcoming visit of Fr Roderick Vanhogen.

Regular readers of the blog are probably already subscribers to the 15th Station, but for those who aren’t aware of it, the 15th Station (or Station 15) is New Zealand’s first Catholic podcast network. We started just over two years ago producing a monthly podcast covering news and events and discussion. Since then, the Station has a couple of other podcasts – Familia (from FLI – great stuff!) and Catechiwi (interviewing brilliant priests on matters of Faith and formation – also fantastic!) and we’re looking to add more in the coming months.

All of this started because of the need to provide more Catholic media – or “new media” as it is now being called – to our country (and the world, I guess) in different formats to meet people wherever they are at. And this need was only really identified and examples given of how to close it effectively, by the work of Catholic podcasters around the world; one of the more prolific of which is Fr Roderick Vanhogen.

I think I may have spoken about Fr Roderick before, but as a quick re-cap, he is a priest based in the Netherlands who started podcasting at the time of the death of Pope John Paul II. Since then, his Star Quest Production Network (SQPN.com) has produced literally thousands of different shows on all manner of topics of interest.

Not only do I highly encourage you checking out the SQPN and the great programming available on it, I also want to shamelessly plug the fact that Fr Roderick is coming to New Zealand. He’ll be here in two weeks where he’ll be speaking in Auckland at Theology on Tap and at the NZ Catholic lecture “New Media for New Apostles” on September 15. Details are available on the NZ Catholic website (and on Facebook too, I believe, but I don’t have the link on me).

Other than a shameless plug, the reason why I raise this today is that I think it is important that we all realise the responsibility we have to “go forth and make disciples of all nations.” As Catholics, we sometimes sit back and leave the evangelising to…welll..Evangelicals! However, this “new media” revolution has really removed any technical excuse that we might have had to putting ourselves out there. Anyone can start a podcast or a video channel or a blog – if you’re reading this right now (unless it’s been printed out and posted to you via carrier pidgeon in some remote location with no internet access), you can help with claiming these new channels for Christ!

So, what are you waiting for? :) If you want some pointers, go to www.station15.co.nz and download our podcasts, sign up for Fr Roderick’s lecture, and then talk to him and us about how we can get your perspective out there for others to see.

God has entrusted this mission to us – are you willing to step up and do something about it?

30
Aug

Changes to the mass to come?

We’re not so good at always recognizing the truly sacred nature of the mass – perhaps because we live in a society less inclined to humble itself to something greater or sacred? It has only been quite recently that I have come to understand the liturgy as something offered to God, rather than for my own learning or enjoyment – although of course those things often come out of the mass anyway.

So what do people think of the new proposals from the Vatican? Communion on the tongue, Consecration celebrated ad orientem (facing east) and renewed use of Latin could all be re-introduced to ordinary Sunday Masses as part of proposals put forward by the Congregation for Divine Worship. The changes seek to enhance the sense of sacredness and promote more adoration, and are in-line with Pope Benedict’s thinking on the liturgy.

It is easy for us to think we should make changes to the mass to make it more enjoyable – yet often the changes we make, like more mainstream pop music or something, seem to spread more widespread misunderstanding about the mass’ sacredness. And if you don’t understand the sacredness, in my opinion the whole thing just seems boring and flat. Until I had an appreciation for the sacred nature of what is happening and of the Eucharist that’s how it seemed to me. So I guess more people might understand that it is something special if we really treat it that way? It also helps to understand the bible maybe and how the mass comes out of what is taught there – also maybe so that the bible readings you hear are reminders, rather than unusual passages which seem to mean nothing! Sometimes the passages do seem to be a bit plucked out and I am not sure of the meaning!

It is also only recently that I came to understand how riddled with convenantal language the bible is. The Eucharist is a sign of the covenant God made with us through Jesus and the Church. It is how we remember the covenant. That’s why it’s important, and remains the centre of the mass. Not to mention Jesus’ presence. Do I really fully grasp that? I’m not sure I do – because if I did surely I would want to be really really reverential – and I am definitely not always that!

Many comparisons can be drawn between the form of the covenants God made with His people in the Old Testament and Jesus – who is the new and everlasting covenant. For example, God made a covenant with Moses in the Old Testament. Like Moses, Jesus inaugurates a Passover, not with the blood of animals, but through his own blood and sacrifice. God’s covenant with Moses is preparatory and incomplete. Through Jesus he makes a covenant that is final and reveals the fullness of God’s redemptive purposes. Finally, like Moses, Jesus will form a new nation – not a nation centered in ethnic identity, but a nation composed of everyone in the world (Jew and Gentile this time!) through his death and resurrection – which is what we celebrate and make real again in the mass.

So I guess changes which reinforce the sacredness and the meaning like communion on the tongue could be helpful? Especially if they are explained well. Although some things, like Latin, may just make the mass less accessible.

29
Aug

Flirting with Relativism

For Christianity, marriage has always been the sacred place reserved for the complete self giving of a person to another. It is a covenant made with God in which you enter into His act of creation through sexual relations. It is in marriage and ONLY in marriage that sexual relationships are declared pure and holy. But, apparently that is not anymore with the ELCA, Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. According to this article, at their most recent Churchwide Assembly, which casts binding resolutions on ELCA churches throughout America, they ‘approved a new policy that no longer declares marriage as “the appropriate place” for sexual relations, but rather calls for “social trust” in associations that are “loving” and “committed.’

Correct me if I am missing something, but when did ‘social trust’, ‘loving’ and ‘committed’ sexual relationships outside of marriage amount to anything more than clear cut fornication? A bishop reflecting in a letter to his congregants noted that the social statement adopted ‘emphasizes that central to our vocation, in relation to human sexuality, is the building and protection of trust in relationships. It therefore affirms that we are called to be trustworthy in our human sexuality and to build social institutions and practices where trust and trustworthy relationships can thrive.’ Something big is missing here. Why emphasise trust when all you are doing in sexual relationships outside of marriage is lying with your body to your partner and to God?

The CNA article goes on to comment:

‘Mark Tooley, president of the Institute on Religion and Democracy (IRD), commented on the decision.
“How sad that the ELCA no longer affirms the timeless Christian understanding of marriage. Instead it is touting secular psycho-babble about ‘fulfilling’ and ‘nurturing’ relationships. How will the church’s young people interpret this tacit approval of at least some non-marital sex?”
“In embracing moral relativism, the ELCA assembly has disregarded the Bible, the views of its own members, and the pleas of Lutherans in Africa and Asia. It has left the mainstream of U.S. and global Christianity, instead following other shrinking denominations like the Episcopal Church and the United Church of Christ towards internal division, accelerating membership loss, and cultural irrelevance.”’

How said it is to see a Christian church leave the path of Christ. What would Jesus really say about a decision like this? I hope and pray that this decision is seen for its true nature and it does not destroy this church.

28
Aug

“Okay. Now, everyone take out your safety pencil and a circle of paper. This week, I hope we can finish our work on the letter “A”.”

When I look back on it, I think 6th Form was my favourite year at school (or year 12 as it’s now known). There wasn’t the pressure of the Form 5 School C exams, and Bursary was just something hazy in the horizon. Maybe it was the competing to get the lowest points in your particular subject (I like points), or being 16 you’re in the prime of your life (or so it seems), or maybe it was the fantastic computer games I remember playing at that time. Whatever it was, that 6th Form year was a good year.

One of the things I remember doing in Form 6 was a giant history assignment on President John F. Kennedy. I’m not sure how it was linked to the history curriculum but I’d always been intrigued by JFK. Well the assassination aspect anyway. What really happened? Who really did it? Were the gunmen behind the grassy knoll? (and were they male models…) Were aliens involved? I don’t think I ever got the bottom of it, but it was a tragic event in American history.

So I really only started thinking about this because of the recent death of Senator Edward Kennedy. From all accounts, a fine politician and someone who must have possessed a strong character. Having a look at the history of the Kennedy family, they seem to have endured their fair share of tragic family deaths.

There was an article in the NZ Catholic on the US bishops praising Edward for his public service and championing the rights of the less fortunate, but expressing sorrow that this did not extend to the unborn (which I guess in some way ties back to Filia’s post yesterday…).

It’s just unfortunate that despite the Kennedy’s being a powerful political and Catholic family, they could not exert significant enough influence towards the protection of the unborn. Oh for a strong Catholic politician.

27
Aug

The Great “Common Good” Debate.

I recently read a poignant editorial written by Bishop Charles Chaput. The basic gist of his piece related to abortion and healthcare funding in the States. What fuelled the editorial was an article published in the British Catholic Journal, which argued that the US bishops were, to their supposed detriment, focusing too strongly on the issue of abortion and ignoring other issues relating to the common good in their critique of the incumbent president.

What I can’t get over, is the general attitude of this vocal group of Catholics (not limited to the paper in question) who believe the Obama presidency is worthy of support. It’s not actually that hard. The issue does not need to be overcomplicated. Plain and simple, there is only one position to be held on issues regarding the sanctity and dignity of the human person. Bishop Chaput puts it best, stating,

the growing misuse of Catholic “common ground” and “common good” language in the current health-care debate can only stem from one of two sources: ignorance or cynicism. No system that allows or helps fund – no matter how subtly or indirectly — the killing of unborn children, or discrimination against the elderly and persons with special needs, can bill itself as “common ground.” Doing so is a lie.

Personally, I think the U.S Bishops, although a tad slow in commencing their critique, have done a wonderful job in taking to task the President and other pro-abortion politicians. What Obama and his colleagues are fighting for ain’t “common ground”, well at least in the sense that we catholics define it. What they are fighting for is a destructive type of utilitarianism that refuses to value the weakest in society – the unborn, the elderly, the sick, and the disabled – as they are not perceived to have any social utility. Let’s face it, that’s what matters these days.

I recently joined a private group with the aim of thinking of ways to instigate social change with regards to the abortion issue. I really liked the way that the creator of the group conceived of change. I have posted the blurb below for your consideration.

We all know that the murder of unborn children is one of the greatest injustices of our time. The question is: what are we going to do about it?

What is required is not simply a legal battle in the courts or the introduction of new legislation, but a social shift in New Zealand and the entire world.

This TRANSFORMATION of society is something that will take time, probably many years, which is why we have to start now. But just because it will take time and effort, does not mean that it cannot be done.

There have been many social movements throughout history that have succeeded against all odds. If William Wilberforce could end the slave-trade, if Martin Luther King Jr could gain civil rights for African-Americans and if our own Kate Sheppard could win women the right to vote, then we CAN abolish abortion.

On the abortion topic, does anyone know anything about the movie doco linked here. I would be very interested to get a hold of it. The testimony from the woman from Planned Parenthood at the beginning sent shivers down my spine and made me feel sick, literally nauseous. (anyone who cares about the dignity of the human person would, not to mention someone who prides them self on being a feminist).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYaTywSDmls&feature=email

26
Aug

Bottoms up to Our Lord and Saviour!

You know when you meet one of those people who quite obviously has a strong sense of where to put their confidence in this life. Not in themselves (though, this is not to suggest that they shy away from what God calls them to do), but in the Three-in-One God, in His power,…in other words, His all-loving opinion.

I’ll be the first to admit I can get overly concerned what others think of me. It’s one of those features of being human and depending on the context, it can mean a misplaced sense of excessive pride or insecurity, or just generally helpful sensitivity towards social norms that avoid self-humiliation on a daily basis.

Anyway, where am I going with all this, you ask. Somewhere, I promise.

The other week (when I should have posted this blog but was prevented from doing so due to power cuts and lack of internet access…*cough* shouldn’t leave it to the last minute…*cough*)…I had the grand pleasure of tagging along to dinner at a local London pub. The reason? It was the ‘reunion’ of a brilliant little party of pilgrims who had spent a few weeks in the Holy Land together the previous year. Included in this party were two dear friends of mine with whom I was staying, a newly married couple with a baby about to burst out of mother, two stunning single lay women, an as-Irish-bloke-as-they-come RE teacher and Papa Chris in his full clericals (rep-re-sent…aow).

It was 8.30pm before Papa Chris (no joke, this is his nickname) finally flew in late and plopped himself at the table. All conversation seemed to stop as he explained with great animation the reason for his lateness…he’d specially arranged for someone to celebrate the evening Mass so he could get away to this date with the pub and old friends. However, the tabernacle key got lost between Masses in the morning – turns out it fell down behind the cupboards in the sacristy – and he’d been driving all over town to check where it might have gotten to.

From the get go it was quite clear that Papa Chris is one of these types not particularly bothered by the opinions of others, but deeply concerned about the opinion of God. Consequently, he had little shame when it came to grace time.

Have you ever been out with friends in a restaurant where the meal arrives and it’s a bit like “Ah, do we grace?” without wanting to make too much of a spectacle. Well, Papa Chris’s philosophy seemed quite the opposite.

After a solemn Sign of the Cross, he proceeded to start using the table as percussion-backing to the familiar tune ‘We will rock you’. If you’ve ever been at a summer youth camp (I’m thinking Summer Connection in the Auckland old-days), you probably know this grace inside out.

With a slight disbelief and an uncontrollable giggle rising dangerously fast from the pit of my stomach (is that possible?), I joined in with the rest of the group, quickly forgetting my shame and reliving my teenage days on Motutapu Island. “We will…we will…thank you…”

And we did…we thanked and praised Him, with our laughter, our noise somewhat like singing, our uplifting and faith filled conversations and companionship. In a funny sort of way, we witnessed to the fact that, for us, it was His opinion that we cared most about. And no one even stopped us to say it was illegal – a miracle in itself! Bottoms up to Our Lord and Saviour.

25
Aug

Is this appropriate?

By now I am sure that we are all well aware of the scandal involving Father Marciel, founder of the Legion of Christ and Regnum Christi movements.

Since this story broke several months ago there have been some further developments regarding the nature of the allegations and the structures in place within the Legion to keep the head of the order accountable.

The Vatican has also commenced an official Apostolic Visitation to investigate the allegations and propose a possible way forward for the Legion of Christ and Regnum Christi.

Now with all this going on, I was a little bit surprised to read this story a few weeks back…

Southern Catholic College to become Legion of Christ institution

The Legion of Christ and Southern Catholic College have agreed to make the school a Legion institution, saying the move will advance Catholic higher education in Georgia.

Southern Catholic College (SCC), a co-educational liberal arts college, claims to be Georgia’s first and only residential Catholic college and describes itself as “grounded in the Catholic intellectual and moral tradition.”

“This is a great step for Southern Catholic and, we hope, for Catholic higher education in North America,” Jeremiah J. Ashcroft, president of SCC, said of the agreement.

He added that the Legion’s “experience and leadership” will help attract students from across North America and will help develop programs with other institutions worldwide.

Fr. Scott Reilly, LC, the territorial director for the Legion, said the order wanted to build on SCC’s “great reputation.”

Is it just me, or does anyone else feel a little bit uncomfortable about the fact that the Legion of Christ are engaging in such high level and long term development activities at this present time?

Remember, the Legion are an order that currently exist under the cloud of an unresolved, and very serious scandal which may even involve current high level leadership, and leadership structures, and this scandal may have to result in the re-founding of the Legion of Christ and Regnum Christi movements.

To me it just doesn’t seem prudent or appropriate that the Legion engages in such serious and long term activities at this present time, as it tends to give ammunition to the detractors who claim that the leadership of the Legion of Christ are not taking this scandal as seriously as it should do.