Firstly, apologies to everyone for the lateness of this post – this week has been a madness of writing and deadlines, and in the effort to remember everything, one important one managed to slip by.
I was introduced to a brilliant essay the other day, in a book by Jacques Barzun, about Lord Byron. (‘Byron and the Byronic’ in ‘The Energies of Art’ by Jacques Barzun). Reading Barzun is an education in itself; (I suddenly find myself scribbling titles of books to go and look up and read afterwards). But reading Barzun’s mini-biography of Lord Byron was inspiring.
Lord Byron is now often summed up as ‘mad, bad and dangerous to know’ (words given to us by one of his mistresses). A recent documentary series celebrated Byron’s seamier side and extolled him as some great early version of a hippie.
Barzun obviously identifies this side of the man, but this was not his only face. Barzun shows him to be a man of action, not only standing up for what he believed but leaping into the fray as well. Byron’s maiden speech in the House of Lords was in support of the northern Weavers who were rioting against new machinery (well worth reading); he died overseas fighting in someone else’s rebellion; he was a Bonapartist and a liberal, and fought for the underdogs of society. I know his politics and his private life do not agree with many people, and there is a danger of the brave and noble things he did somehow justifying the less noble things he did. But reading this essay showed a man who was incredibly complex, flawed but noble, riddled with contradictions and paradoxes. Even if we don’t agree with his politics, it shouldn’t stop us reading his poetry.
History loves to put people in boxes; but as Barzun says, Byron is much more than ‘byronic’.
I find Byron inspiring, because althought I may not agree with his politics or his private affairs, he really did something about things he saw were wrong with the world. Too many people keep quiet and watch the bad things go on unchallenged.
Lastly, The ability of history and historical characters to intrigue, inspire, delight, and instruct was impressed upon me as I read this essay. Why didn’t we learn about this noble side of Byron, and why weren’t we taught his poetry at school? Schools need to teach more classic poetry and history.

)





Recent Comments