Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for September, 2010

30
Sep

Contemplation in Silence

More than a year ago, I posted a spiritual reflection titled “The Modern Cross” looking at the struggles that the Church is involved in, and how this manifests itself liturgically: http://www.beingfrank.co.nz/?p=967 Have a read if you didn’t see it; you might find it helpful and fruitful; and it might be a building block for this post.

I was talking with a friend a few days ago, and he gave me some insights that I want to mention here. This week I want to discuss a certain aspect of our Eucharistic worship: silence, or, in the current times the lack of it. I am struck by how we no longer know why silence is important in the liturgy. There is so much noise at almost every moment of our liturgy that it has become very difficult to pray in a fruitful way, and very difficult to rest in Our Lord. Silence is a means, to allow for supernatural contemplation, which is a fruit of Christian adoration. Contemplation is a fruit of adoration, and these need to be enveloped in the silence of a loving gaze, like when two lovers gaze into each other’s eyes, without the need of words. The finality of the Christian life is contemplation, not action. It is what we will all be in, in Divine Love, in Heaven. We should leave our most profound moments of adoration to be had and entered into, in silence. And when are we, the Church, given entry to adore the Mystery in the deepest sense? Is it not during the Eucharistic Prayer (the Canon) at Mass? My friends, this is why, in the Usus Antiquior (the old Mass), the Canon was prayed in a whisper.

It is done that way so as to aid us to enter the silence of Christ’s loving adoration of the Father, that he lives in the most intense way on the Cross, and which is represented on the Altars of the Church at Mass; it is also done so as to aid us to enter Mary’s Hearts, where she lives her union with Christ in silence – and the sword pierced Her Heart. And we can enter His contemplation, His adoration, in His love, by uniting ourselves to the Heart of Mary – that tabernacle and sanctuary of the Holy Spirit. Is this not what the Church is called to enter at the Eucharist? To adore God, through Christ, united to Her Heart? At this moment of Christ giving Himself to the Father on our behalf, and offering everything to us from His Heart (the Blood the Water, and Spirit), the covenant seal is opened, and all are offered access to the throne of grace: through, with, and in Jesus. This is signified in Revelation 8:1: “When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour.” A further reflection, that I encountered the other day whilst talking to this friend, was that in His final week, Jesus condemns no-one. He no longer speaks in that way, and now enters the climatic moments of the gestures of the Cross, in loving silence.

In the book of Genesis, for the creation of man and woman, the first creation account manifests an order of transcendence, of intelligence, through spoken word, whilst the second creation account manifests an order of love, through loving gestures. There is here in the First Creation (natural creation of the cosmos, reaching a summit in the creation of man and woman), a movement from word to gesture, and this prefigures the same movement in the Second Creation (recreation in Christ), of word to gesture, reaching an ultimate moment on the Cross, with the piercing of the Heart, which will be received and expressed sacramentally in the Eucharist. In the liturgy of the Mass we have a movement from proclaimed Word, to loving gestures. Word ordered to Gestures of Love as expressed in the symbolic gestures during the Eucharistic Prayer.

This is why there should be a type of silence during the Canon: the whisper of love, where human words can no longer express the Infinite Love being revealed through the sacramental signs, through the sacramental gestures of the offering of Christ, the ultimate moment of the revelation of Love. This is where we can learn certain things for our new liturgy from the old. Even if the Canon in the new Mass is not prayed in silence, certainly at the moment of the consecration, our priests could bend forward in humility, lower their voices to the whisper of love, and reverently pray the words of consecration, to emphasize the gestures of Love which are being re-presented; to at least give rise to a respectful silence, so as to foster loving adoration, and loving contemplation. I have seen priests do this, and it is incredibly powerful, reverent, and moving; and certainly helps in allowing the Holy Spirit to draw us into the Mysteries being celebrated. Others, unfortunately, make a “show” of that moment, like a theatrical dramatic moment of grand gestures and “overacting,” – which tends to be counter-productive, and draws attention to themselves rather than Christ. It is a mystical dimension to our liturgy which we have tragically lost.

elevation

When we come to Mass, we come to adore in order to contemplate; from which we are sent out in mission, in order to bring others back to this Source. The Eucharist is the source and summit, as Vatican II taught, and it is the foretaste of the Heavenly Banquet, the Lamb’s Supper. We don’t go to Mass in order to go out and be active and to work. Contemplation is not ordered to activity; activity is ordered to contemplation. We go to Mass to adore and to contemplate, to bring our lives and to offer them, as a living sacrifice, with, through, and in Jesus; and when we have offered, and received from this Source, we go out to find others, to bring them to this Gift – so that they too can contemplate, and discover His Love. Contemplation in Christ is the finality; it is why Jesus came, to redeem us, and bring us into His Divine Life, His contemplation of the Father, in the Holy Spirit. I wonder whether all the activity and noise and agitation from our world, has got into our worship and almost killed our appreciation of silence, even at the high points of the Mass. We no longer understand a loving gaze upon Jesus, entering His gaze upon the Father.

Anyway, I found these insights from my friend helpful and I thought I would pass them on.

29
Sep

What Remains?

In last weekend’s NZ Fashion Week, there was apparently a show in which the audience sat in a dark smoky room, watching a waitress cleaning tables – following which some models came in and strangled the waitress, before proceeding to throw some potatoes around the room.  One may well ask ‘what on earth has happened to the concept of art?’,  ’who wears that designer’s clothes?’, or simply utter a string of dumbstruck ‘who?’s  ’what??’s and ‘why???’s.  But this ‘show’ is not out of place in the current trend of art ‘installations’ that combine obscurity and randomness with the bizarre and horrendously macabre.

The trend toward ‘installation art’ seems to reflect a growing trend toward creating art that does not last; ‘art’ that is assembled then taken away; art that is transient and concept-oriented; art that is not designed or meant to last.  We are seeing a similar trend with the digital revolution; our photos are no longer pieces of paper we can hold and look at, but pixellated images on a computer screen that appear and disappear with the click of a mouse.  The only way things will last into the future is if they are constantly updated and converted into new file formats.

Today, you can go to Italy and see buildings and art works that have been around since the days of the Roman Empire.  Two thousand years from now, what will remain from our civilisation?  It seems the focus of our society has moved away from creating things of beauty that will last and inspire future generations, to creating things that play to trends and fashions but are not meant or intended to last.  It is as if the modern mindset has become locked into the present time; having taken its eyes from the divine, eternal and universal, the most important thing has become what is immediate, present, and personal.

But despite our age of transience, ”all people want to make a mark which lasts“ as Pope Benedict said.  In the Gospel of John, Jesus teaches with regard to bearing fruit, that “It is I who chose you and appointed you to go and bear fruit that will remain”.  In an age of transient things, then, what can we do that lasts?  What remains?

Money does not.  Buildings do not, nor books.  After a certain amount of time, whether long or short, all these things disappear.

The only thing which remains forever is the human soul, the human person created by God for eternity. The fruit which remains then is that which we have sowed in human souls – love, knowledge, a gesture capable of touching the heart, words which open the soul to joy in the Lord.

Let us then go to the Lord and pray to him, so that he may help us bear fruit which remains. Only in this way will the earth be changed from a valley of tears to a garden of God.”  - Pope Benedict, Homily at the Mass for the Election of the Roman Pontiff.

28
Sep

A prophetic utterance?

Well, readers, I thought we might be interested in the following, and what it has to say to us in these post-conciliar times:

Suppose, dear friend, that Communism [one of 'the errors of Russia' mentioned in the Message of Fatima] was only the most visible of the instruments of subversion to be used against the Church and the traditions of Divine Revelation…

I am worried by the Blessed Virgin’s messages to Lucy of Fatima. This persistence of Mary about the dangers which menace the Church is a divine warning against the suicide of altering the Faith in her liturgy, her theology and her soul…

I hear all around me innovators who wish to dismantle the Sacred Chapel, destroy the universal flame of the Church, reject her ornaments and make her feel remorse for her historical past.

A day will come when the civilized world will deny its God, when the Church will doubt as Peter doubted. She will be tempted to believe that man has become God. In our churches, Christians will search in vain for the red lamp where God awaits them. Like Mary Magdalene, weeping before the empty tomb, they will ask, Where have they taken him?

- Pope Pius XII, quoted in the book Pius XII Devant L’Histoire, pp. 52-53 (by Msgr. Georges Roche)

Have we done this?  Have we altered the faith in its liturgy?  If so, was it the right thing to do?  What has the last 40 years taught us?

Have we dismantled our Sacred Chapels?  (Anyone been in a church where you had to ask where the Blessed Sacrament was?)

27
Sep

New server

Hi everyone,

Apologies to those expecting a post from James The Least today, but we needed to take his posting slot in order to move the site to a new server to support the growth in the use of the site. If you are reading this, then the move has been successful. However, changes like this do take some time to propagate through the Internet, so we’ll be running some tests throughout the day to make sure everything is working as it should. We’ll also be checking to make sure all 4,000+ posts (and 40,000+ comments) have been migrated across as well.

If you have any questions, please post them in the comments. We’ll resume our normal posting schedule as of tomorrow (Tuesday).

Thanks for your continued support of our little blog.

God bless,

The BF Admin Team

26
Sep

Social Justice Week came and went…

I must have blinked and missed it. Now, I’m fairly involved in Catholic groups and activities but during that week (Sep 12 – 18) I don’t think I even heard anyone mention Social Justice Week and yet social justice is such an important part of being a Christian. Why aren’t we making more of a fuss about it?! Action for justice is a requirement of our faith. We are called to stand up for the dignity of every human person. All have been created by God in love, made in His image and likeness.

It really saddens me when I come across Catholics who are so focused on things that are going on inside the Church that they forget to look up and see all of the abuses going on in our world. One Catholic I came across even rolled their eyes when I mentioned social justice, as if it was something that only ’liberal’ Catholics do.

On the other hand, I have been a member of groups full of young people passionate about social justice who can see that something needs to be done to challenge certain structures in our world but who can’t manage to see the link with faith and spirituality. This also makes me sad.

I have a friend who will not buy chocolate from companies who cannot prove that they have not used slave labour and she tells others about the issues. She takes the time to research  these things. I respect and admire her for this. There are many social issues that we should be adding our voice to, so it is no excuse if you are not really ‘into’ the theme Caritas chose for the week. One place where you can go to find out about social justice issues is Edmund Rice Justice. Being aware of what is going on in the rest of the world is the first step.

For all of those doing something about it (and I know that there are plenty of you out there) – good on you!

25
Sep

Who holds the trump card?

Reading an interesting article during the week about the authority of bishops I thought I would post on it.

Bishop Robert Vasa of the U.S.A has made some interesting comments on the role of the episcopal conference, or bishops conference, and the local ordinary. In a large conference there would, needless to say, be a wide range of positions held by individual bishops. This would make it incredibly hard for them to come to a consensus on particular social issues (or even doctrinal issues!).

Even within our small bishops conference, the NZCBC, there is a variety of different stances taken by the bishops, and then there is the stance taken by the conference itself.

What Bishop Vasa is trying to assert is that no bishop has any obligation to accept any conference documents in his diocese.

This comes with advantages and disadvantages I think. I totally agree with him, but it is an interesting point, and potentially a dividing one.

Catholic bishops who boldly promote life and family in their diocese have often been condemned for acting more strongly than the national conference of bishops (USCCB), for example by refusing Communion to pro-abortion politicians.  Similarly, pro-life and pro-family advocates have long complained that conference statements are vague and confusing, even misleading.

Deal Hudson of InsideCatholic said Bishop Vasa is the first U.S. bishop he is aware of to tackle “the prevalent misunderstanding” over the relation between the authority of the individual bishop versus that of the USCCB.  Judie Brown, president of American Life League and a member of the Pontifical Academy for Life, agreed.  “Having been involved in this for over 35 years, I can tell you that this speech is long overdue,” she said.

According to Bishop Vasa, statements from bishops’ conferences necessarily tend to be “flattened” and “vague,” allowing certain teachings to “fall by the wayside through what could be called, charitably, a kind of benign pastoral neglect.”

While some call this compassion, “in truth, it often entails a complicity or a compromise with evil,” he says.  “The harder and less popular teachings are left largely unspoken, thereby implicitly giving tacit approval to erroneous or misleading theological opinions.”

“I fear that there has been such a steady diet of such flattened documents that anything issued by individual bishops that contains some element of strength,” he says, “is readily and roundly condemned or simply dismissed as being out of touch with the conference or in conflict with what other bishops might do.”

For your interest, here is a compilation of NZ Bishops’ statements…

24
Sep

“How did the country lose its way, Mel? When did we stop rooting for the man with a flame-thrower or an acid-spraying gun of some kind?”

I was reading the paper on the Tube this week and noticed that Julia Roberts had been in London (also this week) to celebrate the premiere of her latest movie.  This past weekend Ben Affleck was also at Leicester Square for the premiere off his latest movie ‘The Town’.  Oh we’ve had a few red carpet openings in good old New Zealand, but seeing Sly Stallone and his ageing pals trying to sell their action movie surely trumps seeing Tem Morrison strolling up the red carpet.  Still everyone loves celebrities.

Last week while watching the coverage of the Papal visit there were little snippets of the protests in London to the Pope’s visit.  There were some big names involved – Sir Ian Mckellen was pictured there, super famous author Richard Dawkins was there, and I think the funniest man alive Stephen Fry may have been involved in some way.

I think to counteract some of the bad press the Church gets we need to get more celebrities endorsing the faith vocally, and embracing their faith publically.  A quick google on famous Catholics comes up with a long list (which may of course be dubious) that includes such luminaries as Dan Akryod (lapsed apparently), Robert De Niro (non-practicing), Roger Ebert (also lapsed), Mel Gibson (wacky), Jack Nicholson (really?), and well the list goes on.  Some of the content is a little dubious but imagine the impact and influence these celebrities could have had if they have stuck it out with the old CC.

So until we have a suitable replacement celebrity, I’m happy to accept your praise and adulation (or you could also go straight to the big guy).