Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

Archive for August, 2011

31
Aug

What Remains?

“…Tsch, you know, lately the strangest things have been going through my mind, ’cause I turned forty, tsch, and I guess I’m going through a life crisis or something, I don’t know. I, uh… and I’m not worried about aging. I’m not one o’ those characters, you know. Although I’m balding slightly on top, that’s about the worst you can say about me. I, uh, I think I’m gonna get better as I get older, you know? I think I’m gonna be the-the balding virile type, you know, as opposed to say the, uh, distinguished gray, for instance, you know? ‘Less I’m neither o’ those two. …” – Woody Allen in Annie Hall

Plodding along in a relatively banal job the past few weeks has provided much food for thought.  Pre-eminent among this mental food has been to consider the purpose of things that don’t seem to mean or matter much at all.  Also, to wonder when ‘life will really start’, whether the fruits of this banal labour really matter at all in the greater scheme of things, and as Lorenzo Albacete wrote; why why why why why!

I heard a NZ poet talk about a poem he had written – it was (this sounds strange now I write it down…) likening life to an egg carton or corrugated cardboard (bear with me) – in life one may skim over the top of each moment and experience, like bouncing along over the peaks in the egg carton or raised ridges on corrugated card, always looking on and forward but never slowing down to consider the real depth in each moment of life, the richness that each moment and experience is full of.

However strange this analogy may seem, I think there’s truth in it.  Life can become mechanical, prayers can become repetition without considering the depth of meaning in each word; each day can seem like the next step toward the weekend, rather than another shot at living a better life – of starting again anew and being a better person at the end of the day.

Life doesn’t begin after graduation, or when one enters the workforce, or when one earns enough money to never work again; life begins right now; life is now, this very moment and minute.  What I do in this moment, this second is defining my life and character.

I guess a mid-life crisis may be when a person suddenly finds themselves stopping to consider what the real fruits of their life and labour really are.  It’s the question of Ecclesiastes – is it all just ‘vanity’?  It’s the question secularism ultimately has to face at some point – and it has no answer.  At times like this I feel grateful for the blessing of my Christian faith.  Without faith – how can Woody Allen’s character ever satisfactorily fill the gaping hole of his mid-life crisis?

All this has been building up to this rather splendid quote I found a while ago:

“All people want to leave a mark which lasts. But what remains? Money does not. Buildings do not, nor books. After a certain amount of time, whether long or short, all these things disappear. The only thing which remains forever is the human soul, the human person created by God for eternity. The fruit which remains then is that which we have sowed in human souls – love, knowledge, a gesture capable of touching the heart, words which open the soul to joy in the Lord. Let us then go to the Lord and pray to him, so that he may help us bear fruit which remains. Only in this way will the earth be changed from a valley of tears to a garden of God.” – Pope Benedict XVI, Homily at the Mass for the Election of the Roman Pontiff.

30
Aug

A certain clericalism?

I suppose you have all heard it before.  Especially in reference to the bad old days, when priests used to rule their parishes with an iron fist (was that ever possible?).  They would ride roughshod over their parishoners, pushing through what they wanted, with scant notice of the pastoral needs, or of practical necessities, of their parishoners.

And yet, do you know what, these days there are times when I wonder if we have learnt anything at all.

Sometimes, or often times, we see priests innovating with the liturgy, even pushing things through, using and abusing their position in the face of legitimate concerns.  Priests become, for example, the final arbiters of liturgical practice, often not even using the bad excuse of ‘pastoral concerns.’

One interesting example is the placement of bishop’s chairs.  Take a look at some of our cathedrals:

Christchurch, front and centre, relegating the Blessed Sacrament to a room on the side (in a Cathedral named after It, what is more).

Wellington, front and centre, even to the extent of cutting a hole through the middle of the High Altar.

Hamilton, front and centre.

A number of parishes have followed suit.

A friend of mine made the really pertinent observation to me last night: the Blessed Sacrament is the Thing that separates our Catholic Churches from every other building in the world.  Why on earth would we relegate Him to a position other than the most important?

And I couldn’t think of one good reason.

29
Aug

WYD #5: Europe in post-WYD buzz?

As a way of wrap up to WYD, here is a post from George Weigel on the future of Catholicism in Europe.

World Youth Day 2011, to be held in Madrid from August 16-21, will be an important moment in Pope Benedict XVI’s campaign to remind Europe of its Christian roots and to call Europe to a nobler understanding of democracy. As the Holy Father demonstrated in an address in Zagreb, Croatia, in early June, the two parts of that campaign—the recovery of Christian roots and the deepening of 21st century Europe’s idea of democracy—go together.

When Madrid was announced in Sydney back in 2008, I remember people remarking at the time how disappointed they were that again Europe would host the festival. But the Pope in all his wisdom has a plan for Europe and WYD is just a small piece to it.

Hopefully seeing millions of young people all over the world celebrating their faith has inspired Europe to recognise its Christian identity rather than abandoning it.

Interestingly, the same was hoped for in New Zealand where, post-WYD, we have seen very little change. Sure, there have been many young people who have taken up the challenge and re-energised their local parishes with youth groups, liturgy etc.

Call me a cynic, WYD is not (and never was) a one-shot wonder to reinvigorate the Church and its youth. Some seemed to think that a post-WYD New Zealand would be one where churches were full, where Catholics were recognised and respected, and where we would see a new generation of young people would lead a new era of the Church in New Zealand.

Rather WYD is a tool that Catholic clergy and leaders can use to inspire young people. It’s by no means a silver bullet.

WYD is in Rio de Janeiro in 2013 which will be simply massive.

The contrast couldn’t be more black and white between a developed Europe with its wealth, cultural relativism and shrinking Mass numbers and an undeveloped South America, with its poverty, turbulent society, and booming Catholic faith.

I suspect more young people will be called to Rio than to Madrid. Look at Philippines in 1995 where a record 5 million young people attended.

St Rafael Arnaiz, pray for us

27
Aug

An Atheist and Adoration…

Lately, I have been reading articles and books by an atheist by the Pseudonym of Theodore Dalrymple. He rarely discusses religion (from what I have read anyway), rather, he addresses other social issues. From what I can tell, he seems to be pro religious influence in society. Especially religion from a Judeo-Christian tradition.

He can be labelled as a conservative philosopher, and I found myself agreeing with him on various issues from education to the sexual revolution. A friend of mine called him prophetic in regards to his thoughts on the degradation of human sexuality that flowed from the sexual revolution - I informed him the Pope Paul VI had pretty much said the same thing 30 odd years before.

Anyway, I recommend him to you all. Here is one article in which he praises Pope Benedict XVI.

On adoration, the NZ Apostolic Congress on Mercy is currently being held in Christchurch and the courageous people organising it have adoration of the Blessed Sacrament continuing the whole time the conference runs. I was privilaged to have the 3am spot this morning. I encourage people to think about nocturnal adoration and perhaps even start a nocturnal adoration society!

Please pray for the conference and especially for all those who who do not know about Divine Mercy!

St Faustina, Pray for us!

26
Aug

“What is the sound of one hand clapping?”

Ok so I missed a couple of weeks but did anyone really notice? It’s a bit like the recent WYD in Madrid, a real blink and you’ll miss it kind of thing. Well maybe it was just me being out of the loop for a couple of days, but I don’t recall seeing much media coverage about the WYD except for the storm that led PB to postpone his speech. Anyone willing to fill me in on how it went?

Attended a NZ Mass last weekend. What’s with the Creed and the word changes? I was saying the Creed as I knew it (you know, the one with the proper wording) and there were all these new words thrown in. Is this parish specific or are we trailing some new liturgical norms that haven’t yet been introduced to the rest of the world? I seem to recall something about a new missal coming out…

25
Aug

Is Papal social teaching “a wickedly deformed foundation for social policy”?

National Catholic Register (it isn’t THAT NCR) points out that at the recent Spanish World Youth Day, Pope Benedict denounced those who put “profits before people”, maximum profit before the common good, and mercantilism before ethics/ethos. And it took about as long for the libertarian/free market mafia to hit back at the Pope as they did following similar comments in his encyclical on Charity.

Now,  I’m certainly no commie or socialist, and neither is Pope Benedict, in fact I think we would both advocate for a limited scope and size of government, taxation proportional to that needed to achieve that government, and strong respect for property rights. But I don’t think that is the guiding principle of society. According to the free market ideologues that makes us in the same boat as Zapatero, Fidel Castro and Kim Jong Il.

It is a tragic irony that papal economics mimic those of the Church’s socialist opponents

says Richard Epstein of the Hoover Institution, adding that:

Denouncing those who put ‘profits before people’ may stir the masses, but it is a wickedly deformed foundation for social policy…

Now I might be wrong, but it seems to me that the only way you would say that about the Pope’s comments is if you believed that there should be no state/only a minarchist (sic) state, almost no taxation, and absolute property rights. I only have space to deal with the last commitment. Property rights do not exist as a good in themselves; they cannot be absolute and inviolable under all circumstances. They exist so that humans can pursue their natural material, moral, spiritual, familial and communal end.

As such the property rights remain relative to this end. If someone is in desperate need, my property rights are more limited than they would be if no one was in desperate need. My second cloak isn’t really “my” second cloak if there is a naked man lying on the street outside my house. He has a moral right to my cloak. He is owed it in justice.

Yes, it is better if I can give it to him in charity, but it still isn’t the terrible crime that some libertarians say it is if the cloak has to be taken from me to stop a naked man freezing to death. The principle also extends to putting negative restrictions on my actions, if by performing those actions I would make it pretty much impossible for someone else’s end to be fulfilled. This is something someone committed to liberalism (I mean that classically, not theologically) would find abominable.

Note this doesn’t mean that economic equality is a goal for just government,  the redistribution extends about as far as making sure everyone has enough for their natural end should they be, in some sense, in desperate need. It’s not a welfare state; it should start at the lowest levels of the subsidarity roots, and work its way up if necessary.

It’s a safety net. But it should basic welfare better than the welfare states are currently does anyway because it is more pervasive and more urgent in its concern for the basic needs of the human. And it’s not just the very rich that owe it justice to those who are real risk of being unable to fulfil human ends, it’s anyone who has enough to fulfil human ends.

So…

  • Obviously we can have a pretty broad range of economic options about how this is done, but it should really fit somewhere in the ground between the progressivist state and the libertarian conception of society.
  • There are other reasons why people are libertarians/liberals, of course. If you really want to know why I think other reasons for being libertarian fail you can ask me in the comments below and I might respond if I have time, if not if might pop up another week.
  • Anyway I’m pretty happy for the comments to go any which way you guys want, although I would ask you not to let a single issue or person dominate discussion. Seeing as we are coming up to an election in NZ the issues of state asset sales, state spending, capital gains taxes, death duties, GST exemptions and financial transactions taxes have been hot button issues.
  • Finally, I might remind you that there is major famine in East Africa and Timor Leste (Worldvision say hunger is worse in East Timor than in parts of East Africa!). So I plead with you, if I can, to consider helping out, if you can, and to consider whether, the extra dollars in your pocket are really totally “yours”.

 

24
Aug

Rugby imitates Life imitates Rugby

If you were watching Bay of Plenty vs. Canterbury last night, aside from a pretty good game of rugby, you would have seen the minor tussle on the sideline, sparked by a Canterbury player protecting the ball as it rolled into touch, and a Bay of Plenty player grabbing it (thinking it was BOP ball… or maybe not..) and the Canterbury player trying to grab it from him, etc.  culminating in an all-in ‘exchange of phone numbers’, as the commentator put it. 

The penalty went against Canterbury – which raises something I’ve always felt was slightly unfair – that it’s not the person who starts the brawl, but the person who retaliates who gets hit hardest with the rule book.  I suppose in some cases the retaliation is worse than the inciting incident, which doesn’t help matters – but.  But it’s like life too – the teacher would always reserve the final telling-off (which everyone hears) for the kid who retaliated.  Like life… one of the hardest things to do is to walk away from a provocation without saying a word or retaliating. 

And this – perhaps indirectly – points to my point for today.  Rugby imitates life imitates rugby.  I think the thing a lot of non-rugby fans think about rugby (perhaps about sport too) is ‘What’s the big deal? It’s just a game’.  With All Black or rugby-related insignia staring out at you from every second shop window, perhaps it’s a valid point.  But sport is much more than just a game; it’s a metaphor for life; it’s a nation’s pride in some of it’s finest young men doing a difficult thing with flair and beating the world at it (hopefully); it’s a celebration of human ingenuity and physical prowess, and it’s real – not computer-generated. 

The other question – can we pray for an All Black’s victory in the World Cup?  Are these kinds of prayers right? heard?  I remember hearing a story about St Josemaria Escriva playing a game of boules, and, in the heat of the game, prayed that his ball might land closest to the pin on his very last throw (perhaps there was something more to the contest – I forget) – but to his great surprise, his ball landed closest, and he won the game – but he said, though enormously grateful for this answered prayer, he thought immediately afterwards that perhaps he ought not to pray for things which really do not matter.  

But does rugby matter?  It’s hard not to let a fervent prayer or two escape from your lips when watching the closing minutes of a final or a tight game; I think it would be churlish not to pray for the AB’s – though what we pray for – the right attitudes, no injuries, all conditions as perfect as may be leading into the games.. praying for all they need to be able to win?  Is this how to pray for the All Blacks to win the World Cup?!