Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

06
Sep
09

God and Caesar

Our society is rather hostile to religion playing a role in public life. Perhaps because of a valid concern at how that seems to play out in fundamentalist Muslim societies. Is democracy only secular? Christ’s instructions were to “render unto Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and unto God the things that are God’s” after all (Matthew 22:21), which suggests we should respect ruling authorities does it not?

Cardinal George Pell recently released a book entitled God and Caesar: Selected Essays on Religion, Politics and Society. It might be worth a read if you’re interested in what the role of democracy rightfully should be for a Church which puts the dignity of the human person at the centre of things. Especially in light of the recent smacking referendum here in New Zealand, and the debate about how United States’ citizens should vote considering Obama’s anti-life stance on many issues.

The book brings together a selection of his writings on Christianity, politics, and society from the last ten years and raises interesting issues that lead to interesting questions for us. What is the moral heart of democracy? How can the Church work for goodness, truth, community and the common good? Is the dignity of the human person central to New Zealand society, or are we more about productivity and work? Does our society care for the elderly and the young? Do we value disabled people? What makes a person a person? How can we improve things?

Cardinal Pell is a leader of the Catholic Church is Melbourne, and has always been a weighty presence in the Church. Born in Ballarat, he was signed to play Australian Rules football for Richmond. Despite this and his academic success, he decided to join the priesthood, to the initial disappointment of his Anglican father, who told a nun that George might just as well have been “a bloody dill. But you probably don’t want dills, do you?”

Because of his early promise, Pell was sent to complete his training at the Vatican’s elite Pontifical University in Rome. This was followed by a PhD in history at Oxford, where Pell studied how the authority of the popes had been challenged and defended in the early Church.

A reviewer of a biography written about him said “In recent decades a war has been waged within the Catholic Church between traditionalists and those who want to drain its teachings and institutions of much of their meaning. This is the story of that struggle, told through the life of a leading combatant, George Pell, who has spent much of his adult life battling attempts to, in his words, “trivialise Jesus Christ”.”

The Maxim Institute reviews his new book with the following interesting observations and quotes from it:

One of the most helpful of these meditations is found at the start. Cardinal Pell begins by considering the relationship between law and morality, hammering the connection between “the dignity of the human person” and the moral foundations of secular law. “The suggestion that religious views should be silenced, or that believers should be excluded from public debate, cannot be accepted in a democracy. Religious people have as much right as the non-religious to state their views, and argue for them” says the Cardinal. He points out that “the appeal to rights is a moral argument, and it is this appeal to moral authority that gives force to laws enshrining rights.”

Without a conception of human dignity and moral order, freedom becomes directionless and law deformed and corrupted. “Instead of protecting life and critical social values, the law begins to undermine them. In the process, the authority of law, and the legitimacy of the law making process, comes into question.” Quoting Michael Novak, the Cardinal concludes that “the free society is moral, or it is not a free society at all.” … “True freedom requires truth” reminds the Cardinal, “and is the fruit of consistently striving for what is good.”

…This is especially true when the Church takes unpopular stands: on behalf of the unborn, or in defence of traditional marriage and family life. With bracing confidence, His Eminence asserts that “the Church reserves the right to speak up for the democratic spirit, for the common good, and for a view of human rights based on the moral truth about the person.”

It is this “moral truth about the person” which the Cardinal advocates should be at the heart of democracy…”Secular democracy is democracy without transcendence, where the key point of reference is the supremacy of the individual, and his unimpeded will.”

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print this article!
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Diigo
  • FriendFeed
  • Netvibes
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

6 Responses to “God and Caesar”


  1. 1 John JensenNo Gravatar Sep 6th, 2009 at 1:46 pm

    Cardinal Pell is a leader of the Catholic Church is Melbourne

    I thought Cardinal Pell was Archbishop of Sydney. Is he not?

    jj

  2. 2 bamacNo Gravatar Sep 6th, 2009 at 2:02 pm

    Cardinal Pell was Arch-Bishop of Melbourne before being moved to Sydney where he was consecrated Cardinal.

  3. 3 fisheNo Gravatar Sep 6th, 2009 at 2:54 pm

    On religion in public/democratic life…

    How could this be swung in today’s multicultural societies? As a simple example, if we are to have a plaque outside a building, should there be multiple prayers inscribed on it reflecting Christianity, Islam, Sikhism, and Buddhism, etc.?

  4. 4 BenedictaNo Gravatar Sep 6th, 2009 at 7:56 pm

    Well spotted Fishe.

    If the defence of the Human person – of infinite worth in and of his/her own person and nature from the time of conception – was the foundation of morals and ethics in a democratic society then the Judeo Christian faith (fully expressed in the Catholic faith) would be presenting its heart. That is after loving God, loving neighbour as self. NO other religion or philosophy holds this concept to be true. Either the human person as a physical being is irrelevant to the ultimate purpose of the journey of the soul or spirit or persons are mandated to have more worth than others.

    So the human person is not a neutral reality around which the orthodoxy of multiculturalism can cluster peacefully about.

    Multiculturalism is a myth and an experiment. It is political relativism. As it fails the belligerant and powerful will prevail.

    So religion aside the value of the human person and what or who decides that deeply affects everyone everywhere.

    Cardinal Pell is a champion of truth.

  5. 5 eyeWitnessNo Gravatar Sep 6th, 2009 at 8:52 pm

    oh sorry! yes Sydney. Maybe you recognise your religion in the values and moral norms you vote and advocate for at least? it is shocking and judgmental in our society to render one ideology true above another – yet simple common sense tells us that there must be one ideology that is true, otherwise there is no point in believing in anything. People don’t normally think that, for example, believing murder is morally acceptable is true for you if that is part of your religion but false for me, because we believe that is true for everyone, no matter what else they might believe. Which is why we want a law for everyone saying that are not allowed to murder people – yet is that fair if some people dont’ believe murder is bad as part of their religion and that is true for them?

  6. 6 NZC EditorNo Gravatar Sep 7th, 2009 at 11:31 am

    I’m in Sydney for work this week and had the pleasure of attending High Mass in St Mary’s Cathedral yesterday. Cardinal Pell gave a great homily on the relationship between faith and works or faith and deeds.

    Also had the pleasuse of hearing a particular Dutch priest singing the Gospel of the day. Nice work Fr Roderick Vonhogen — coming to an Auckland near you in the next few days: http://www.beingfrank.co.nz/?p=2159

Comments are currently closed.