Please click here to vote for us in the Catholic New Media Awards 2009 - thanks!

05
Sep

The ethics of prayer

In one of my social work classes a few years ago we were discussing ethics and spirituality. I had been working at a Christian social agency and mentioned how our whole team would gather each morning and pray for the clients and their situations. The lecturer gave me a look which I knew meant that he was about to challenge me and I wished I had kept my mouth shut.

What ensued was a rather long discussion/debate as to whether it was ethical to pray for our clients without asking their permission. Our lecturer (I could not tell if he was just stirring or really believed in his argument) stated that if we believe in God and that our prayers can have real impact on people’s lives then we should be asking them before we take any action in doing so.

This certainly made me think.

We settled on the agreement that if we believe that God has only good intentions then it would be ok to pray for the clients as long as our prayer was that God’s will would be done in their lives rather than prayer for what we thought should be happening in their lives, or specific needs that we felt they had.

I was reading in the Marist Messenger this week Fr John Kelly’s article on prayer of petition. He notes Aquinas’ four conditions necessary that our prayers be answered. The first of these is: ‘The petition must be for oneself” and comments that “Charity obliges us to pray for other people but often our prayer for others is not answered because they put obstacles in the way”.

This also made me think. 

In the last couple of weeks I have had conversations about this with a few other people. One person mentioned that a friend specifically asked them not to pray for her. What do you do then? I was reminded of one of the comments on my post about baptism a while back in which someone said that they would not want those prayers prayed (or I think the word used may have been ‘babbled’) over their child since they did not believe in God.

Do you pray for someone who clearly tells you that they do not want to be prayed for?

To be honest, I would probably pray for that person even more.

04
Sep

No one who prays is ever alone…

Well, what a morning it has been in Christchurch. A 7.4 magnitude earthquake struck about 4.30am and there has been a huge amount of damage to buildings and roads. Thank God only a few people have been hurt.

I bet that a lot of people who woke up with the tremors and shakes felt scared and alone. My wife and my first reaction was to get our baby and huddle in bed to wait out the quake. I hope that families were able to stay together and give each other comfort and care.

The earthquake made me think of two things an relation to loneliness and friendship…

Last night I was at my cousin’s confirmation (congratulations to him and all the other candidates!!) which made me think the earthquake was an outpouring of the spirit! Bishop Barry talked about how it is essential to pray and establish a solid friendship with Jesus. In this way, we will never be alone.

It also made me think of a great blog I read the other day by the Archbishop of New York.

I was on the Jersey Shore, at the Villa Saint Joseph, in company with priests. At supper I had quietly admired one of them, now retired, and listened as he joined in swapping stories about past assignments and colorful incidents from priestly life. It was clear to me that this particular priest had worked hard for over fifty-five years –poor parishes, teaching, caring for the sick. He was an example of a senior priest who had “been in the trenches” and served Jesus and His Church faithfully.

Later that evening I sat alone up on the second-floor porch and enjoyed the sea-breeze. I also smiled as I watched the married couples and families walk along the boardwalk, and had to admit to myself that it sure would be nice to have a wife, kids, or grandkids here with me. Not that I was regretting my priestly celibacy, mind you, because I wouldn’t trade it for the world. I guess I was just imagining “what-if …”

And then I saw the old priest below me on the front porch. He, too, was all alone. He, too, was looking at the couples and families walking-by. And I felt sorry for him. This priest, who had given it his all as a generous, committed priest, there all-by-himself in a rocker on the front porch.

Down I went. Yet, as I approached, I saw his lips moving, as if he were in conversation with a friend; his eyes were closed, although he was not asleep, because the rocker was moving; he hardly looked lonely at all, because there was a smile there …

Then I saw the rosary in his hand, and the breviary (the book of daily readings and prayers, mostly from the Bible, which we priests promise to pray daily) open on his lap … and I realized he was enjoying the best company of all.

I went back upstairs and finished my cigar.

And recalled what Pope Benedict XVI had observed earlier in the summer when he had begun his own vacation, “No one who prays is ever alone.”

Both bishops have an excellent point.

Saints Agatha, Emidius, Francis Borgia and Gregory Thaumaturgus, patron saints of earthquakes, pray for us!

03
Sep

“Your theory of a donut-shaped universe is intriguing, Homer. I may have to steal it.”

How do you measure intelligence.  Not sentience but book smarts.  You can be really sharp on a subject of your choice but maybe a little dull on other topics.  Stephen Hawking, for example, is a theoretical physicist and according to Wiki is well known for his contributions in the field of cosmology and quantum gravity.  So he’s pretty much The Man in that field I take it.  But how much of a theologian is he.

This has made the news in the UK today.  For those to lazy to clicky-click the link (I know I would be) it’s Stephen Hawking saying that there is no place for God in theories on the creation of the Universe.  Apparently his theory is that “Because there is a law such as gravity, the universe can and will create itself from nothing.”

Like a lot of people I am intrigued by the creation of the universe.  How did it happen, how long ago, what caused it, etc.  Now I’m not going to argue matters of physics, cosmology, or quantum gravity with Stephen Hawking.  But if things just ‘came together’ to create the universe, then who put those ‘things’ there in the first place?

02
Sep

Question:

I need some answers, and quick. The annulment process. It’s not for me or anything – I’m happily MARRIED and I’m 100% certain that it’s valid. I would be grateful for any canon lawyers in the house and anyone who has had first or second hand experience with the process to comment on my post. Please, please….I need some good info, and quick…..I have a couple of specific questions (but anything general on the topic would be good too)

Validity – if someone lied when they said they would remain open to life and children but continued to contracept whilst they were married, despite knowing full well that they were usurping the Church’s teachings on the matter, does that invalidate the marriage?

Can anyone describe the process – how you go about applying for one?

I’ve also heard that the process is quite intense? i.e. the questions are rather prying….. Can anyone offer comment on this aspect of the process?

Logistics? How long does one have to wait before they can apply? Costs involved?

Does anyone know someone I could contact in the Diocese of Auckland to have a brief conversation with?

Does anyone have anything to offer with regards to the practices of the Diocese of Auckland?

Any assistance would be greatly appreciated – go collective knowledge!!!!

01
Sep

A Thought on the Might of the Underdog

What is it in human nature that likes to see a whole fleet of British ships foiled by a handful of grubby pirates?  Or the unlikely little hobbits perform the task that even the greatest of men and elves and wizards cannot perform?  This paradox, theme, mytheme, whatever you want to call it, is repeated time and time again in the very best and favourite stories and plays and films and literature of all time;  We love to see the underdog triumph; the weak show power, the foolish show wisdom, and the humble proven mighty.

“Consider your own call, brothers and sisters:  not many of you were wise by human standards, not many were powerful, not many were of noble birth.

But God chose what is foolish in the world to shame the wise; God chose what is weak in the world to shame the strong; God chose what is low and despised in the world, things that are not, to reduce to nothing things that are, so that no-one might boast in the presence of God.”  - 1 Corinthians 1:26-29

We can take courage from our weaknesses, and encouragement where we feel inadequate.  Someone wrote that if we try our hardest to accomplish something, where we fall short God will carry us the rest of the way.  It is often through the least likely people that great things are done.

31
Aug

bi-lingual to bi-Missal

This week in my post, I wanted to give special kudos to our courageous, forward-thinking, and wise Bishops, who once again have shown their independence, autonomy, and defiance of Rome, in the face of so much control and manipulation manifested by the Holy Father over the Liturgy. In April of this year, Rome gave approval to the universal English translation of the 3rd edition of the Roman Missal of Paul VI.  Just over a week ago, the full approved English text, in digital form, was given to the Bishops.

Since the promulgation of that Missal, Bishops Conferences of English speaking countries around the world have been applying to Rome for recognitio for their own adaptations, for their local regions. For our situation in NZ, our Bishops have wished to have a Maori translation sitting alongside the English, on the same page in the Missal, with the Latin hidden away in the back. Why is this? Because our Bishops know how important cultural concessions are in NZ. They understand the political climate in NZ, and are willing to humbly submit themselves to that particular issue. Well done our Pihopas! They know how our NZ people want and need to have the Maori in the Missal alongside the English, demonstrating how we value the Maori culture in our Liturgy, more than our outdated Latin and Roman traditions. They understand how Maori culture should have a primary place in the expression of our faith; and that modern issues, even political ones like this, should take precedence in our worship and gathering – more than traditional faith expressions which are so out-of-date. This is an issue of social justice in our worship of God, and our Bishops, knowing the situation on the ground here in NZ far better than the Holy Father, have wished to go all the way in their service of our indigenous people, and think that the Maori is much more important than the Latin.
Our Bishops rightly understand that this move will have an enormous impact upon priests, and will draw out from them that hidden desire that they all have to say the Mass in Maori. They rightly see that the thousands in our congregations that love Maori will finally have a chance to hear and celebrate the Mass in the local tongue. Our Bishops wish that our liturgy be a place of cultural expression, and social justice, for those who have suffered and who have been sidelined by injustice. Our liturgy must be a Maori cultural expression, so that it is truly Kiwi, and local, and separate from those in Rome. This must be done so as to show the Maori people that their language is on an equal footing with the English, and more important than the Latin. Thank God for the NZ Bishops who have a proper view towards the liturgy.
There has been a dangerous move in recent times, led by the recent Holy Fathers, of reintroducing the Latin back into our liturgy (which was finally removed after Vatican II), and of going back to older traditional ways, e.g., the antiquated Tridentine Mass. Knowing of these strange moves to have the liturgy in a language that nobody understands, and in a form which manifests medieval theology, our Bishops have decided for an innovative move of placing the Latin at the back of the Missal (where it belongs for them, and so that our priests forget all about it), and of placing the Maori and English at the front, so that the liturgy is truly ‘ours’ and ‘mine’. Thank God our Bishops think according to cultural and personal needs, otherwise the Maori could have found itself relegated to the back of the Missal, like the Latin, or it could have been printed in another book altogether. Imagine the scandal if the Maori were relegated to such an underprivileged position.
But there has been a snag. Rome, as per usual, wants to control the Maori translation of the new edition of the Missal and hasn’t given recognition to the Maori translation, which means that our Bishops can’t print their Missal (with the Maori alongside the English) in time for the Advent introduction that they were hoping for. I don’t understand why they don’t just go ahead and print it anyway, like they did with the Our Father. They brought in the new Our Father without Roman approval, so why can’t they just print the bi-lingual Missal without approval? Because of this Roman delay, we are going to have to wait before we pray the new translation in its fullness. Apparently, due to this issue, only the congregation’s responses will change in Advent (the first Sunday), and all the other prayers will remain as usual. 
When will Rome give approval to the Maori? Who knows. It could take up to a year or more. So that means that we will have our beloved Mass in a bi-Missal mixture situation for about a year, where the people’s responses are up-to-date, but the priest’s prayers, the Eucharistic prayers, and many other prayers, remain in limbo waiting for Rome to get going and approve the translation of the Maori. Has the Maori been translated? I don’t quite know.
Why don’t our bishops just go ahead and print the new Missal? They’ve done such things before, and stood up to Rome, and showed them what they really believe. Come NZ Bishops, take up that courage you’ve displayed before and show Rome that you are Bishops in your own right, and control your own liturgy, and are willing to act fully at the service of the Maori cause, and the disappearance of the Latin cause.
I don’t really know why we need the new translation anyway.
Marty
30
Aug

“You’re not in Rome now, Dr JTL”

When it comes to the combination of intelligence and all things medical in my family, there is not a lot I can bring to the table – I leave that to my medically trained and very gifted little sisters. I do, however, take an interest in some things medical-related as they pertain to my Faith…and to my over-developed sense of hypochondria. But it’s a couple of points on the former I’m keen to discuss.

First thing is an article I saw on the NZ Catholic website while researching for this post talking about a federal judge ruling that Obama’s guidelines for funding embryonic stem-cell research violate federal law. The result is that this judge has stopped such funding while a lawsuit against it continues. As I understand it, this is a good thing as it will delay the further dissecting of embryos for scientific research. Yay! Don’t get me wrong – as the aforementioned hypochondriac that I am, I applaud science exploring new ways to cure diseases typically put in the “too hard basket”, but not at any cost.

One point to note for me is that we still seem to be doing nothing about the behaviours and practices that are creating these “surplus” embryos in the first place. And I’m not even really talking just about IVF and similar treatments, but rather a society that increasingly is adjusting to and now expecting a certain model of family that is different to any that we have known in our history: that of one of convenience. I know what I’m writing is controversial, but being entirely frank, isn’t there something a bit crazy about building a society around careers, dual-incomes, and delaying having kids (if having them at all) until middle-age…and even then only having one or two? Is anyone else concerned about the shape of the future such a plan leads us to?

No? Just me then. ;)

Okay, well then the other thing I wanted to mention was an article from the NZ Herald about a website hosting company going bust. While this may seem more of a Catholic.geek-type article, I was interested to read that one of the pages that went down was that of Natural Fertility NZ – a non-profit that teaches about Natural Family Planning (NFP).

Out of interest, I thought I’d do a bit of googling to see how easy it is to learn about NFP when the Natural Fertility NZ site is down (it’s back up now though). When looking for NZ-based sites, the answer is not very easy I’m afraid. Sure, organisations like FLI offer courses and stuff, but I’m talking purely web-enabled, easy to follow, free resources for Kiwi Catholics…heck, any Kiwis, to be able to peruse and learn about this very smart and safe way to plan your family. Really very poor showing overall. Better when you head overseas, but not by much.

Look, I get that it’s a bit more complicated than other methods of family planning. Ish. But still, it’s 2010 for crying out loud – why can’t we make this kind of information a bit more accessible? It has to be a $200 course? For that matter, why is this not taught in Catholic schools? I know a big deal is made about sex-education (or lack thereof) in Catholic schools, but wouldn’t there be an opportunity to teach NFP while at the same time retiring other methods/myths like the rhythm method and talk about Theology of the Body while you’re at it?

No? A bit too radical? Maybe we don’t want to be talking to teenagers about sex? I disagree. I think they’re going to be talking about it anyway, and the messages they’re going to be getting are going to be far more anti-Catholic than not. And when they (inevitably) turn to the internet for information, they’re going to find a paltry 243,000 results in Google for “Natural Family Planning” as opposed to 3,310,000 for “using condoms” or 36,200,000 for “contraception”…if they even know what “Natural Family Planning” is enough to search for it in the first place! Hardly scientific data, but representative of how well known the various options are I think.

I think it’s a lost opportunity. Instead of placing Catholic sexuality as the punchline to our youth, why not present it as the ultimate sexuality? One which places it within the context of a loving marriage, where both husband and wife communicate with each other about this aspect of their lives, and where there is no need for pills or condoms or any of that stuff. Sounds like something worth waiting for to me.

But maybe I’m just old-fashioned. Not so old-fashioned as to not start your week with stem cells and sex talk though! ;)